Adl fashion uae news

  • Irene Bonney Faulkes March 26, 2017 @ 4:48 am

    That lies are placed in front of the Goyim world-wide is not new. It has been occurring for centuries in many nations.

    In relation to books removed by Amazon in the cowardice of some one remembers the ‘Diary of Anne Frank’ that proved after very many years, to be a great hoax. This was not to engender millions for this ‘Anne’ because she perished but rather for her uncle. He was said to be reprinting the Diary so as to garner more wealth basically as a robber.

    My children read the tale in the mid-sixties although apparently it had been published in English in 1952. Of course, they with I also, believed it thoroughly.

    Every other person to whom I have spoken did not have even a moment’s doubt, so much did they place their belief in these false ‘people of God’. In the early eighties I was taken to visit a man who had been ‘one of those Jews who as a lad, had lived as a rat’, fighting for his life as well as all of the others in the 1943 uprising in the Warsaw Ghetto in 1943 against the Germans.

    Now I wonder if that also is not a faked story to gather pity - and money. We all believed implicitly the planned stories of not only Anne Frank and German brutality but also of the Holocaust. Many have already been awakened as to the fraudulence of these stories.

    What else would one believe when is a fellow-traveler with all of those millions of Evangelicals, Pentecostals, Charismatics and Fundamentalists who had swallowed the enormous lies. Even decent people who are not Christians, often cannot believe that a cult people could perpetrate such hoaxes upon the rest of the world and Christians generally believe to lie is to sin.

    Today Pentecostals and Charismatics alone are said to consist of over 8% of the world’s population and this is a vast number to follow the greatest Hoaxes this world has ever known.

    We need to get to the bottom of the reason for such perfidy that is coming to light more and more.

    These people do not follow the Old Testament but rather the Rabbinic distortion and Satanic over-turning of the Truth of the Lord God to replace it with the Oral Tradition commenced at least two and a half millennia ago when Judah was in captivity in Babylon.

    Their gods of the Kabbalah, the ten Sefirot and their god Ein Sof. Their God is not the Lord as revealed in the Old Testament and their Messiah never was and never will be, the Lord Jesus Christ. The bell is sounding for all Christians. Are you listening?

    As a people, who are said to be Jews but are not the Jews, hundreds of millions of Christians have and do now wrongly believe they are the same people of the Old Testament. This is not the case. Even then, those generations time after time were following idolatry and the Lord God.

    To believe such a people could suddenly change into being malleable sufficiently to switch from their evil to welcome the Lord Jesus Christ as Messiah ‘when He stands on the Mount of Olives’ shows a demented and deluded mind in this respect, alas, in all of those millions.

    The arrogance and self worship of these people makes them blind to any possibility of determent in regard to their aims to rule this world, with billions killed off, but leaving enough Goyim to serve them as slaves.

    They forget this. ‘He who sits in the heavens shall laugh, He shall hold them in derision. Then He will speak to them in His wrath, confound them. Kiss the Son (Jesus Christ) lest he be angry and you perish’.

    These people will never kiss the Son. They would never welcome Him as their Messiah. The ridiculous idea that they will is merely a myth, a demonic curse placed upon many of the true people of God who do love the Lord Jesus Christ.

    However, ‘How can two be agreed’? Judaism and true Christianity are poles apart and can never be cemented together. It is to follow Christ or Belial.

    Those who are supportive of Judaism become partakers of their such great sinning, which is a consistent behavior. This positions all such ‘lovers of Israel’ with the enemies of Christ.

    You hundreds of millions out there throughout the world, following the current End-Time beliefs, the unscriptural looking forward to a Rapture, Great Tribulation and a Millennium with an Israel to the fore and a rule by its Messiah! It is time to become aware of the dross that in actuality wipes out your starry-eyed dreams.

    ‘Seek the Lord, while He may be found. Call upon Him while He is near’ through the heeding the teaching of those servants of the Lord who do follow the truth regarding the Jews who are not Jews.

    Why not apply yourselves to revisiting all of the Scriptures in this regard and look for the deviations from the truth, as such swerving aside has taken even the guileless among us, to a total disregard of the contents of books such as Romans, Galatians and Hebrews to name just these three.

    There is plenty of information and reading materiel out there, with people personally proclaiming the truth of these matters, that all if they wish can access and make inquiries as to the verities of the truth of gospel over and above Judaism that was never a part of the doctrines left by Christ with the twelve Apostles.

  • KathJuliane March 26, 2017 @ 12:12 pm

    ESCWA published a report that found Israel guilty “beyond a reasonable doubt” of the “grave charge” of operating systematic discrimination and oppression against the Palestinian people.

    In other words, after many years of investigation inside Palestine by specialists the report says Israel is a racist, anti-human, anti-civil rights, “apartheid regime.”

    Naturally, this got the Jew’s knickers in a bunch, and Tel Aviv responded with it’s usual knee-jerk blathering and davening, the first rule of which is — Don’t debate the issue, don’t attempt to refute the factual points, just denounce it as something “scurrilious” and “Natzi” in order shut it down.

    Oy veh! The UN report is just like Der Stürmer!

    We are now in “the post-truth” carnival world of Jewish funhouse mirrors.

    The Jews don’t say that there are glaring factual errors, or there is little or no truth to the report, it’s simply the height of the mortal sin of anti-Semitism that anyone should notice what the Jews are doing to the Palestinians, research it, document what is going on inside of Palestine, and then publish it for the world to see.

    Defamation? You foolish Jews, how can anyone defame you further than you’ve already done? You are doing it to yourselves, and have been doing it for 2,000 years.

    It’s a post-truth world here at Francis Fukuyama’s delusional “end of history,” and Jews, along with most of the Lügenpresse (lying press) anymore, simply attempt to discredit where the criticisms are coming from and deflect them.

    In fact, the very word Lügenpresse was branded as a taboo word in Germany a year or two ago. The word was coined by the German Ministry of Defense in a 1918 government published book “The Lügenpresse of Our Enemies” during WWI concerning foreign black war propaganda against the Germans.

    In any case, this is all quite ironic in that not three weeks prior to the publication of the ESCWA report, the UN hosted a display of NSDAP political propaganda starting with WWI highlighting the importance of free press.

    “Israeli Practices towards the Palestinian People and the Question of Apartheid” drew a quick response from the Israeli government which called it a “Der Stürmer-like report”.

    In fact, neither are remotely like each other. Der Stürmer was a weekly tabloid-format, satirical, political newspaper published by Julius Streicher, which had the minuscule circulation of 480,000 at its peak of popularity, out of a population of 71 million inside Germany alone.

    And while the tabloid usually focused on political anti-Semitism, the paper also attacked Weimar era decadence, corruption, and liberalism, it also published anti-Catholic, anti-Communist, and anti-monarchist propaganda.

    Charlie Hebdo–good; Der Stürmer-bad. If you pay attention to what the Jews are doing to the Palestinians, and have been for almost 100 years, you are an Evil Anti-Semite™.

    The backlash continued as ESCWA head Rima Khalaf resigned after she was asked by the Secretary General’s office to withdraw the report and she refused.

    Rima Khalaf, who has become my hero with impeccible academic and political credentials, is by definition, a Semite. However, Jews have somehow clamped their claws on the word “anti-Semite” as to exclusively mean hatred of Jews. She is an anti-Semite Semite, just like the late, blessed, White House correspondent Helen Thomas who at the age of 94 feistily told the Jews off, who was Lebanese American, and therefore, also a Semite.

    Rima Khalaf was born in Kuwaiti, so she’s Arab, now a Jordan national; educated in American universities. Her resignation letter published by Jadaliyya published by the Arab Studies Institute is extremely informative and interesting (below).

    A citizen of Jordan, Ms. Khalaf holds a BA in Economics from the American University of Beirut and a Master’s in Economics and a Ph.D in System Science from Portland State University in the United States of America. She is married and has two children.

    In UN-Arab diplomatic circles, she has significant position, honors, clout and respect, and is a politically powerful woman and politician in her own right within the Kingdom of Jordan.

    Ms. Khalaf held the position of Assistant Secretary-General and Director of the Regional Bureau for Arab States (RBAS) at the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) from 2000 to 2006.

    She led important regional initiatives on education, knowledge acquisition and economic growth in the Arab States. She was the founder of the pioneering Arab Human Development Report.

    The first Report in the series, entitled “Creating Opportunities for Future Generations,” received the 2003 Prince Claus Award. The third Report, entitled “Towards Freedom in the Arab World,” received the King Hussein Leadership Prize in 2005.

    Ms. Khalaf is a regular contributor to regional and international policy forums concerned with the state of development in the Arab world.

    She participated in a number of international commissions chief among them are the High Level Commission on the Modernization of the World Bank Group Governance (2008–2009), and the International Advisory Group for Managing Global Insecurity (2007–2008).

    Ms. Khalaf also served as the Chairperson of the Advisory Board of the United Nations Democracy Fund (2006–2007). She was a visiting scholar at Harvard University during the spring semester of 2009-2010.

    Also in 2008-9 Khalaf served as the Chief Executive Officer of the Mohammed bin Rashid Al Maktoum Foundation.

    Ms. Khalaf received the League of Arab States award for “the Most Distinguished Arab Woman in the Field of International Organizations” in 2005 and an Honorary Degree of Doctor of Humane Letters from the American University of Cairo in 2009, in recognition of her “important regional initiatives in education, women’s rights, civic engagement and economic growth”.

    In December 2009, the Financial Times listed Ms. Khalaf among the top fifty people who shaped the decade.

    On Friday, March 17th, 2017, Rima Khalaf announced her resignation from her position at the United Nation saying the UN had pressured her to withdraw a report published by ESCWA accusing Israel of being an Apartheid Racist State.

    The UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres requested the removal of the report from the UN website after previously distancing himself from it. Text of Resignation Letter by ESCWA Executive Secretary Rima Khalaf

    [The following text is the resignation letter submitted by ESWA Executie Secretary Rima Khalaf in response to the formal request by UN Secretary General that ESCWA withdraw the publication of a report that asserts Israel is committing Apartheid. Click here to access the full ESCWA report, which has since been removed from the UN website.]

    Dear Mr. Secretary-General,

    I have carefully considered your message conveyed through the Chef de Cabinet and assure you that at no point have I questioned your right to order the withdrawal of the report from our website or the fact that all of us working in the Secretariat are subject to the authority of its Secretary-General.

    Nor do I have any doubts regarding your commitment to human rights in general, or your firm position regarding the rights of the Palestinian people. I also understand the concerns that you have, particularly in these difficult times that leave you little choice.

    I am not oblivious to the vicious attacks and threats the UN and you personally were subjected to from powerful Member States as a result of the publication of the ESCWA report “Israeli Practices towards the Palestinian People and the Question of Apartheid”.

    I do not find it surprising that such Member States, who now have governments with little regard for international norms and values of human rights, will resort to intimidation when they find it hard to defend their unlawful policies and practices. It is only normal for criminals to pressure and attack those who advocate the cause of their victims. I cannot submit to such pressure.

    Not by virtue of my being an international official, but simply by virtue of being a decent human being, I believe, like you, in the universal values and principles that have always been the driving force for good in human history, and on which this organization of ours, the United Nations is founded.

    Like you, I believe that discrimination against anyone due to their religion, skin color, sex or ethnic origin is unacceptable, and that such discrimination cannot be rendered acceptable by the calculations of political expediency or power politics. I also believe people should not only have the freedom to speak truth to power, but they have the duty to do so.

    In the space of two months you have instructed me to withdraw two reports produced by ESCWA, not due to any fault found in the reports and probably not because you disagreed with their content, but due to the political pressure by member states who gravely violate the rights of the people of the region.

    You have seen first hand that the people of this region are going through a period of suffering unparalleled in their modern history; and that the overwhelming flood of catastrophes today is the result of a stream of injustices that were either ignored, plastered over, or openly endorsed by powerful governments inside and outside the region.

    Those same governments are the ones pressuring you to silence the voice of truth and the call for justice represented in these reports.

    Given the above, I cannot but stand by the findings of ESCWA’s report that Israel has established an apartheid regime that seeks the domination of one racial group over another. The evidence provided by this report drafted by renowned experts is overwhelming.

    Suffice it to say that none of those who attacked the report had a word to say about its content. I feel it my duty to shed light on the legally inadmissible and morally indefensible fact that an apartheid regime still exists in the 21st century rather than suppressing the evidence. In saying this I claim no moral superiority nor ownership of a more prescient vision.

    My position might be informed by a lifetime of experiencing the dire consequences of blocking peaceful channels to addressing people’s grievances in our region.

    After giving the matter due consideration, I realized that I too have little choice. I cannot withdraw yet another well-researched, well-documented UN work on grave violations of human rights, yet I know that clear instructions by the Secretary-General will have to be implemented promptly.

    A dilemma that can only be resolved by my stepping down to allow someone else to deliver what I am unable to deliver in good conscience. I know that I have only two more weeks to serve; my resignation is therefore not intended for political pressure.

    It is simply because I feel it my duty towards the people we serve, towards the UN and towards myself, not to withdraw an honest testimony about an ongoing crime that is at the root of so much human suffering. Therefore, I hereby submit to you my resignation from the United Nations.


    Rima Khalaf

    The very informative full report as RA Feibel informed us has been scrubbed from the U.N.’s website, but you can read it here and download it as a PDF.;-fallout-b

  • KathJuliane March 27, 2017 @ 4:08 pm

    Dear Citizenfitz,

    As much as the Jews would love to see all of this vanish down the rabbi hole, my guess is that the dead links (if not hacked by the Internet JDL) may be due the folks doing some YT Channel housekeeping after the conference last Friday and trying to edit and arrange and post clips.

    WRMEP & Grant Smith’s IRmep run on shoestring budgets (seems to be the common problem for non-commercialized, honest journalism, like RJN and +BN), and don’t have huge technical staff and a deep-pocket budget like AIPAC, the political parties, Jones, etc.

    I know that Smith does pay out considerable money related to fees and lawsuits under the FOIA getting government documents, which he keeps archived at his IRmep site about the activities of the Israel Lobby, going back as far as the 50s and 60s (if not earlier) when efforts were made to get the Zionist Organization of America to register as a foreign agent, before it was re-incorporated as AIPAC.

    His IRmep site is a national treasure trove of declassified documents related to decades of Israel Lobby activity, which also includes the evangelical Judaizing Zio-christian Israel worshipers. He’s expanding that aspect now under the rubric of “Israel Affinity Organizations” (IAO).

    I went to WRMEA’s main YT Channel video page, and while there are a number of segments from last year’s 2016 conference, there is currently only the 9 hour video which was live-streamed at the time, and the introductory segment clip by Grant Smith.

    Mearsheimer was the keynote speaker, #2 on the speaker roster. While the Mearsheimer clip isn’t listed with any new link (probably will be the next segment to go up), his talk is on the master 9-hour video “The Israel Lobby and American Policy” at 1:04:00

    WRMEA: John Mearsheimer - Changes in the Lobby

    Full speech given by John Mearsheimer (University of Chicago professor and co-author of Israel Lobby and U.S. Foreign Policy) discussing how the lobby has changed since the original publication of the book he co-authored with Stephen Walt and the future of the lobby under the new administration at “Israel Lobby and American Policy” conference on March 24th, 2017 at the National Press Club.

    Down in comments, Vadios831 broke down the speakers’ times in chronological order

    0:31:00 Grant Smith
    1:04:00 John Mearsheimer
    1:47:00 Maria Lahood
    2:45:00 Panel with Jim Moran and Nick Rahall
    4:28:00 Hanan Ashrawi
    5:20:00 Tom Hayes (starts with excerps from Two Blue Lines)
    5:46:00 Jack Shaheen
    6:11:00 Wajahat Ali
    6:58:00 Khalil Jashan
    7:35:00 Ilon Pappé
    8:24:00 Clayton Swisher (starts with excerpts from The Lobby)

    Here’s updated link to the full 9 hour video.

    Updated link: Grant Smith - American Opinion and AIPAC

    Must see: Full speech given by Grant Smith (Director of Institute for Research: Middle East Policy - IRmep) discussing underreported data revealing American attitudes towards U.S. aid to Israel and AIPAC at “Israel Lobby and American Policy” conference on March 24th, 2017 at the National Press Club
    (.com/watch?v=Kfrey4vzf3U&t=885s )

  • Brother Nathanael March 27, 2017 @ 8:16 pm

    The Jewish Thought Police At AIPAC’s Conference
    By Brother Nathanael
    Street Evangelism Report//March 22-27, 2017
    AIPAC - Washington, DC

    Dear Real Jew News Family,

    Here I am on the Streets of DC and at the AIPAC Conference.

    I just finished my 6th day on the Street and my second day with the Jews at the AIPAC Conference which began Sunday morning.

    Most of them know me from my Videos, especially the 20 year olds.

    I got into many discussions with them about why Jesus is the Messiah, why Zionism is evil, and the many sins that AIPAC commits every day.

    These sins, I told them, include:

    1) Genocide of the Palestinian people

    2) Theft and destruction of their lands, resources and property

    3) When Jews originally purchased some lands from the Ottoman owners, the Jews expelled the poor Arab workers from these lands, which Prophet Isaiah forbade

    4) Bribing the politicians on Capitol Hill

    I told all the boys and young men I spoke with that Yom Kippur is coming up, and that they have to repent of these sins and renounce Zionism.

    Then tonight, not that I should have been surprised by this, but this was still disturbing, the Jewish Thought Police entered the scene.

    I was talking with a group of Jewish boys, all with their yarmulkes on, who’d asked me why I was against AIPAC.

    I began to explain, and right then a Jewish woman working as private security officer for AIPAC told the boys to end the discussion because they were forbidden to talk to me specifically.

    I told the boys that according to Prophet Isaiah, it’s a curse to let a woman rule over you, and that if you listen to her and stop talking to me man to man, you will lose your manhood.

    The boys walked away whipped by this Jewish woman private security officer, with their tails tucked between their legs.

    The same thing happened again with two other sets of Jewish boys and young men who came up to talk with me, knowing me from my Videos.

    I was so disgusted the third time this happened, that I called out to anyone who might listen, “Here are the Jewish Thought Police! They forbid anyone from AIPAC to have a peaceful discussion with me!”

    Jews have a real problem with facts, with truth, and thus, as it is with the Amazon Book Burning, the Jewish Thought Police enter in.

    Right after this, a Gentile young man came up to me from AIPAC to ask me some questions, and this time two Jewish women security officers came up to him, and said he was forbidden to speak to me.

    This Gentile young man stood his ground and firmly said, “I’m having a discussion with him, and you are not going to stop me!”

    I gave him a great big blessing with my Holy Cross.

    Here’s the real kicker, dear RJN family.

    Another bunch of Jewish boys and young men from AIPAC who know me from my Videos, came up to carry on a discussion with me and ask some questions.

    Then some man from AIPAC security came up, and told these young men they were forbidden to talk to me.

    This man was a Gentile, not even a Jew.

    The boys leave, and I in my disgust called out, “This is what this country has come to, a goy working for the Jewish Thought Police!”

    On another note, since last Wednesday I’ve been holding up the Holy Cross at 9th and Pennsylvania Ave on the median strip. Who drives by me last week but Governor Huckabee, a well-known Zio-christian.

    He looked at me holding up the Holy Cross as he drove by, and suddenly put on a very sour expression.

    Today, Michael Flynn, Trump’s former White House National Security Advisor, drove by while sitting in the passenger seat.

    When he saw me and the Holy Cross, he had a very disturbed, even troubled look on his face as he passed by.

    God Bless You All!

    +Brother Nathanael
    Publisher Real Jew News @

  • KathJuliane March 27, 2017 @ 10:20 pm

    Nope. Doesn’t work, Rabbi Cohen.

    Perhaps the burning of Jews in the synagogue were military reprisals for the terrorist acts of Judeo-communist Partisans, who then left the local people holding the bag and to take the blame in order to heap up the world’s outrage; or else grandfather was Judeo-communist Partisan himself.

    There are hundreds of WWII incidents where Christians were burned inside their own churches and monasteries by various warring parties, not to mention homes, barnes, whatever.

    I won’t go into it, just pointing out to the rabbi the fact that act of burning Jews inside their own synagogues during a horrid war was not that much different from Christians being burned inside their own churches. In the same war. By Judeo-communist Partisans, no less.

    Oh, wait, I forgot. To Jews, Jesus is a false messiah, an imposter, Christians are Edomites, and churches are really nothing more than pig pens to many Jews.

    That’s why in Israel, Settler Jews and orthodox Jews routinely urinate on (or in) churches. Or spit on our priests if they get a chance.

    Despite this rabbi’s personal tragedy of his own grandfather’s death during WWII when when his grandfather, along with a community of Jews were allegedly burned to death in a synagogue, allegedly torched by “Natsis” or their local allies, such a dreadful death as happens in war still does not prove that 6 Million Jews Died in the Gas Chambers at Auschwitz.

    Anyway, Amazon knuckled under to pressure about the Confederate flag being a racist “hate symbol” and stopped selling items with the flag on it back in 2015, then immediately the Jewish whinging started concerning the historical revisionist books.

    I figured the Jews (and the liberals in his own corporation) would eventually beat down Bezos.

    What I really liked about this clip is how Rabbi Cohen made such a stereotype of himself.

    YouTube: CBS13-Sacramento (2015)

    A week after Amazon stopped selling Confederate flags in the wake of a deadly shooting, Jewish organizations are calling on Amazon to ban books denying the Holocaust.

    Sacramento Rabbi Mendy Cohen is leveling serious charges against Amazon for selling books denying the Holocaust.

    Blatant anti-Semitism,” he said. “To deny the Holocaust is another mask of blatant anti-Semitism.”

    The books say the stories of gas chambers and ovens in World War II Nazi Germany are made up.

    “My great-grandfather was burnt in a synagogue alive with 500 Jews that the Nazis burned,” he said.

    The books carry titles like “Did 6 Million Really Die?” and “Synagogue of Satan.”

    A social media petition is calling on the company to remove all Nazi propaganda from the site.

    Compounding the dilemma for Amazon is its recent stance on the Confederate flag. The company joined Walmart, Sears and eBay by stopping sales of merchandise with the flag in the wake of a South Carolina shooting that left nine people dead.

    Amazon has a list of offensive products it refuses to sell, which they say includes products that promote or glorify hatred, violence, racial, sexual or religious intolerance. But Amazon officials did not respond to CBS13 for the story.

  • KathJuliane March 28, 2017 @ 12:01 pm

    Making Jewish Vulture Capitalism Great Again

    “What’s mine is mine, and what’s yours is mine…especially at distressed prices at the fire sale after “Jewish lightening” struck a Gentile competitor’s home and business.

    Mint Press News: The Israeli Plan To Capitalize On Syria’s Civil War

    Israel has revealed a new plan to help rebuild war-torn Syria - with the ultimate goal of securing massive stores of natural resources.

    The plan would rely on significant investment from the U.S., a financial burden that will likely fall hardest on the shoulders of the American public.

    MINNEAPOLIS– When the United States or any other nation disposed to foreign interventionism is forced to justify an invasion, the term “nation-building” is often used prominently in their defense, along with often dubious claims of humanitarianism.

    While the phrase “nation-building” serves as a useful euphemism – implying that the destructive force of war can actually be something constructive – it is, in practice, nothing more than an updated moniker for neocolonialism.

    This is especially obvious when you consider that nation-building has less to do with actually physically rebuilding a nation state and more to do with restoring “order” to dysfunctional or failed states – an order defined by the invading nation.

    But as history has shown, the dysfunction that is used to justify nation-building within a particular country is often brought about by the very entity that seeks to do the “rebuilding.”

    Not surprisingly, the subsequent reconstruction of the invaded nation involves re-aligning its politics with those of the invading force while also ensuring that any and all resources are developed or controlled by entities friendly to those “restoring order.”

    The six-year-long conflict in Syria is a textbook example of the efforts of several governments to destabilize and then re-create a nation in order to align it according to their own geopolitical and economic interests.

    As recent evidence has shown, efforts to destabilize the geopolitically and economically strategic nation of Syria date back to the 1980s, when the Reagan administration analyzed the Syrian regime’s potential for destabilization in a purposely provocative manner.

    But from 2006 to the present, the United States’ long-standing effort to destabilize Syria has come into its own, ranging from the creation of subversive terrorist groups to the widespread use of weaponized media propaganda, as well as strong sanctions and the ever-present threat of foreign intervention – all in the name of ousting the current Syrian regime led by Bashar al-Assad.

    While the U.S. has received most of the attention that has thus far been directed at foreign nations operating covertly in Syria, other countries have been just as involved in bringing about the current conflict, with no plans to halt their operations until Assad has been deposed.

    Chief among these nations is Israel, a colonial ethno-state that has consistently defended any and all efforts – regardless of their connection to terrorism – that could depose Assad.

    With Assad’s regime proving to be more difficult to eradicate than presumed, Israel has now officially announced its plan to “rebuild” Syria. This plan would be funded by the U.S. and would grant Israel what it wants most – sovereignty over the energy-rich Golan Heights.

    Antagonism between Syria and Israel has been a strong factor in regional politics since the mid-20th century, when Israel’s founding provoked a series of wars between the Jewish ethno-state and its neighbors.

    Though Syria was very much involved in these early wars, as well as in clashes with Israel over disputed territory on their shared border, the animosity between the two nations culminated decades later in the Six-Day War of 1967.

    This conflict saw the seizure of Syrian, Jordanian and Egyptian territory following these countries’ military defeat at the hands of the Israel Defense Force.

    Though Israel eventually returned some of the territory it seized, it continued to retain control of the Golan Heights, moving to fully occupy the territory in 1981 through the construction of settlements and the expansion of its military presence in the region.

    In the years since, Israel’s expansion has continued despite international opposition, including opposition from the United Nations – which continues to deny Israel official sovereignty over the Golan Heights.

    Due to the seizure of this land and other political and military conflicts with Israel over the years, tensions between Israel and Syria have remained high, especially considering that they have technically been in a state of war with each other for several decades.

    However, aside from the three major wars fought between the two nations, the antagonism between Syria and Israel has largely become more furtive, with Israel beginning to take more aggressive – albeit covert – moves against the Assad regime in the early 2000’s.

    Israel’s recent involvement in Syria clearly points to a concerted effort to destabilize the Assad regime and the country in general.

    According to released Wikileaks cables, Israel’s covert subversion and destabilization of Syria was launched in or around 2006, when the Israeli government created a plan to aggressively destabilize Syria by covert means – with the support of the United States, Turkey, and “moderate Sunni” regimes. [The same year, 2006, that Israel belligerently invaded Lebanon in its obsessive war against the defensive forces of the southern paramilitary wing of the duly recognized parliamentary political party of Hezbollah.]

    The plan centered around creating “paranoia within the Syrian government; to push it to overreact” by overblowing and creating a domestic threat from Islamic extremists, fomenting sectarian strife and exaggerating Iran’s influence in these and other domestic conflicts.

    As Wikileaks’ editor-in-chief Julian Assange noted, the cables revealed that the Israeli government felt that if Syria became “sufficiently destabilized, [Israel] might be in a position where it can keep the Golan Heights forever, or even advance that territory.”

    This plan laid the groundwork for the emergence of the current conflict in 2011 – chiefly through the funding of Islamic extremists and the strengthening of sectarian divisions.

    In the years since, Israel has also contributed to destabilization in other significant ways, such as aiding and funding “rebel” opposition groups (including those widely considered to be terrorist organizations); violating already tenuous ceasefire agreements between the Syrian regime and opposition forces and having an illegal troop presence active in Syria to prevent it from “becoming a front against” Israel.

    Fomenting sectarianism in Middle Eastern nations is a time-tested strategy that has frequently been used by Israeli political and military interests against nations whose territory it seeks to annex.

    The decades-old “Yinon Plan” for Israeli expansion, for instance, called for the “dissolution” of Israel’s neighboring states, including Egypt, Syria and Iraq. As Anti-War noted, “Each country was to be made to ‘fall apart along sectarian and ethnic lines,’ after which each resulting fragment would be ‘hostile’ to its ‘neighbors.’”

    Thus, it seems logical that Israel would follow the same playbook in Syria, particularly when it is so keenly interested in the Golan Heights.

    The Golan Heights are key to understanding Israel’s interests in destabilizing Syria.

    At face value, Israel’s greatest interest in retaining control of the region is linked to the large Israeli settler population that has displaced the native Druze and lives in exclusive, Jewish-only communities – communities that have proliferated under the cover of the chaos caused by the current conflict in Syria.

    As the crisis in Syria drags on, Israel continues to make efforts to expand its settlements in the Golan Heights, despite the fact that these settlements are considered illegal under international law.

    In 2015, Israel announced plans to quintuple the size of its existing settler population of some 21,000 Israelis in the Golan by adding more than 100,000 settlers by 2020.

    As the New York Times noted at the time, this plan was the work of the “many Israeli leaders and thinkers seizing on the chaos in Syria to solidify Israel’s hold on the Golan.”

    However, the expansion and protection of the existing settler population is not Israel’s main interest in the Golan Heights.

    The expansion of the Israeli settler and military presence in the Golan Heights has been carried out in order to strengthen Israel’s ability to secure the one thing it wants most from the seized territory – significant fossil fuel reserves said to amount to “billions of barrels” of oil.

    Controlling the Golan is in Israel’s interests, as it is a nation that lacks key energy resources.

    Ever since Israel occupied the Golan Heights, there has been the promise of gaining access to that area’s significant shale gas reserves. However, developing these reserves has remained elusive, as its illegal occupation of the area renders any efforts to extract resources illegal as well under international law.

    With the Syrians and international community distracted by the chaos caused by Israeli-funded opposition groups, Israeli fossil fuel interests have begun drilling exploratory wells throughout the Golan Heights.

    Chief among these interests is Afek Oil and Gas, an Israeli branch of the New Jersey-based company Genie Energy, whose investors include Dick Cheney, Jacob Rothschild and Rupert Murdoch – further evidence of the collusion between U.S.-Israeli geopolitical goals that clearly enjoy the blessing of the elite.

    Israel is determined to claim the Golan’s resources at any cost – not just out of its national interests, but its business interests as well.

    Reconstruction As Occupation – Israel’s Galant Plan

    With Assad not only weathering years of destabilization efforts but actually strengthening his regime’s power, Israel has apparently realized that it might have to changes its strategy to consolidate control over the Golan Heights and its resources in the event that Assad proves impossible to remove from power.

    According to Yedioth Ahronoth, an Israeli daily newspaper, Yoav Galant – Israel’s minister of construction – has proposed a multibillion-dollar plan to rebuild the nation after the civil war it has helped to fuel has destroyed large swaths of the nation’s infrastructure.

    According to the proposal, the U.S. would take the “special role” in assuming the financial burden of reconstruction through “dozens of billions of dollars” of investments.

    Despite the weight that such a plan would place upon U.S. taxpayers, Galant asserted that the plan would be advantageous to the U.S., as well as Russia, Europe and the “moderate Sunni world.”

    Not surprisingly, Galant’s plan comes with several caveats. One of them is the negation of Iranian influence in Syria, the other key reason for Israel’s involvement in the country. But most telling of all is the plan’s demand that Israel’s sovereignty over the Golan Heights be internationally recognized – the condition on which the entire plan hinges.

    Galant’s proposal to rebuild Syria came only weeks after Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu stated that “the Golan is part of Israel and we will stay there for the world to acknowledge it as so.”

    This plan – as absurd as it may seem to some spectators – may be the Israeli government’s last-ditch attempt at a “diplomatic” solution to the Syrian crisis, as tensions between the Israeli and Syrian militaries have spiked in recent weeks.

    Though Syria and Israel have exchanged fire on numerous occasions throughout the conflict – with numerous exchanges taking place in the Golan Heights – a recent exchange in which Syria shot down Israeli planes in its air space represents the greatest escalation of overt military hostilities between the two forces since the conflict’s inception.

    This is largely due to Israel’s reaction to the incident, as the Israeli defense minister promised to destroy Syrian air defense systems “without the slightest hesitation” were Syria to use its systems in such a way again.

    Israel may soon begin eyeing a military solution in order to accomplish its goals in Syria if its proposal to “rebuild” the country falls on deaf ears.

    Lots of excellent links at:

  • KathJuliane March 28, 2017 @ 5:39 pm

    The sign of the Son of Man is, of course, the Cross.

    “The sign of the Cross shall be a terror to His foes,” exclaims Saint Cyril of Jerusalem, “but joy to His friends who have believed in Him, or preached Him, or suffered for His sake.”

    +BN proves this all of the time in his Street Evangelism.

    He wrote in an above comment: “The Palestinian cause has reached its grave, sorry to say. Jews have more power than ever. A handful of Jews, many of them totally neurotic, “protesting” is not going to change anything. +bn

    John Mearsheimer agrees.

    Highlights from John Mearsheimer’s keynote address at the March 24, 2017 Israel Lobby and American Policy Conference.

    John Mearsheimer: Dark Times Ahead for Israel

    Mersheim’s highlights:

    The United States has a special relationship with Israel that has no parallel in modern history, and it is almost wholly due to the [Israel] Lobby.

    [Not just the Jew Power, the perspective of IRmep & WRMEA is the combined political clout of Jew Power, Neoliberalcons, and evangelical Zio-christians embodied by, but not limited to, AIPAC].

    The aid is given unconditionally. In other words, Israel gets its aid even when it does things the United States opposes, like building settlements in the West Bank.

    Only someone who is blind and deaf would not recognize that the United States is deeply committed to defending Israel’s behavior at almost every turn.

    Public support for Israel in the United States has never been particularly strong. One way the Lobby deals with this thin support is to have significant influence both inside the Democratic and Republican Parties.

    There has been a marked erosion in support for Israel within the Democratic Party in recent years, which raises serious questions as to whether the Lobby will be able to maintain bipartisan support for the “special relationship” in the years ahead.

    Anyone who wants to be a serious player in the making of US foreign policy understands full well that if he or she criticizes Israel there will be a price to pay.

    The result is that there is no serious debate about Israel or the “special relationship” in Congress, the mainstream media, or prominent think tanks like the Council on Foreign Relations.

    THE stain on Israel’s reputation is its brutal treatment of the Palestinians, and the fact that it has become an apartheid state.

    Until recently, Israel and its supporters were able to maintain the fiction that there would eventually be a legitimate Palestinian state living side by side with Israel.

    But it is now clear that there is virtually no chance that will happen.

    Bottom line, the days when Israel was seen as a morally upright David taking on an evil Goliath are over. The damage to Israel’s reputation probably started in 1982 when it invaded Lebanon, but it has accelerated in a marked pace over the past decade.

    Where the Lobby almost always wins is on matters relating to the Palestinians and financial support for Israel.

    The fact that the Obama Administration could do virtually nothing to get Israel to move towards a two-state solution, yet still opted to provide Israel with 38 billion dollars ( billion) of aid over the next decade is clear evidence that the Lobby remains very powerful.

    I believe dark times are ahead for both Israel and the Lobby. There’s no reason to think that Israel is going to move toward a two-state solution. Greater Israel is here to stay, and that state is, and will remain, an apartheid state.

    It will probably take another twenty or thirty years before we understand how this conflict will ultimately be resolved, or maybe not resolved.

    Regardless of the outcome, I am deeply sad to say, that the decades ahead promise abundant trouble for Israel, and especially for the Palestinians. And the United States will not be spared either simply because the Lobby will be working overtime to protect Israel and protect the “special relationship” which is likely to harm America’s intellectual life as well as its politics.

    P.S. To Hanna. Welcome to RJN family.

    I appreciate your sharing of your own struggles to remain true to Jesus Christ, your insights, and your commitment to seeking out the historical facts and truths to punch through the confusing lies and fables of the Shoah Business, and the continued psychological and political subjection, and collective punishment of Germans as a consequence of WWII in order to find some healing for yourself.

    I fully empathize with what you are saying. It’s taken me a long time to get clear of the confusion, manipulations, and spiritual chaos which life in Zionist Occupied America has created for the past 100 years, especially after WWII. I started awhile back reading as much as I could from the brave and dedicated historical revisionists.

    One great website to start with is Justice4Germans:

    “Exploring the little known, but true history of National Socialism, Hitler and WWII, what was really behind it, and seeking truth, justice and honour for the German people

    From his about page:

    This is the blog of a 55-year-old man of German descent who is fed up with seemingly endless propaganda, lies, distortions of fact, and the defamation of the German people, who suffered more than any other nation in World War II, and is still occupied today.

    And I am sick and tired of the absurd and ever-growing volume of lies being manufactured, told and sold to this day about Hitler, National Socialism, WWII, and Germany. I am tired of Anti-Germanism and of self-hating Germans.

    The term “Nazi” and all of its sinister connotations is a further insult to those who are no longer here to defend themselves, their ideology and actions. It is a term coined by the enemies of National Socialism as a pejorative slur. They called themselves the “NSDAP” and that is term I shall use. Anyone posting comments is asked to respect this as well.

    I am neither a Neo-Nazi nor Skinhead, and am not “Right-Wing” in terms of my political views. I am not a White Nationalist nor a promoter of Aryanism. I am not part of the Christian Identity movement. I am not “supremacist” or ‘extremist” of any kind, and I do not support or endorse anyone who is. I have no affiliations.

    I am not here to promote hatred, violence or revenge against anyone or any group.
    Indeed, nothing on this site should be construed as such. Nor am I “radical”, except in as far as telling the truth, sharing largely unknown facts and expressing unpopular views based upon such facts may be considered radical.

    “In times of universal deceit, telling the truth will be a revolutionary act.” George Orwell

    There are two sides to every story, but “official history” is always written by the victors with a view to justifying themselves, and to wash the blood off of their own hands, down the drain of time. And although the Allied leaders may be long gone, there are still many today who have a vested interest in keeping the “official” narrative alive, and to build upon it, for their own political agenda, to justify what they are doing in the world today, as well as, to keep people from questioning what they have been taught.

    You are in my prayers, dear Hanna.

    IC XC
    NI KA

    Christ Conquers All!

  • KathJuliane March 29, 2017 @ 12:48 pm

    Jewish Neocons and the Deep State - Philip Giraldi

    [New Zealand researchers claimed that sarcasm is the highest form of intelligence.

    In this piece, Philip Giraldi’s dry wit and and deadpan sarcasm skewers Jewish neurosis and mass delusion, and their neocon cargo cult science passionately devoted to stamping out Antisemitism in all of its infinite forms real, perceived, or imagined, and which willing Shabbos Goy buy into.

    He gets a standing ovation from me.]

    Vineyards & Fig Trees

    Jewish Neocons and the Deep State

    Posted on March 24, 2017 by Richard Edmondson

    [ Ed. note – AIPAC’s annual policy conference begins this Sunday in Washington. With that in mind I thought I would post the following commentary recently published by Philip Giraldi.

    In the article, Giraldi, a former CIA officer, makes two essential points:

    a) that “neocons are most definitely an integral part of the Deep State,” and,

    b) that “nearly all neocons are Jewish.”

    He also discusses efforts now to stigmatize even the very use of the words “neocon” and “deep state.”

    One writer for instance has recently claimed that the word neocon revives “a great many stupid and ugly myths about Jewish bankers orchestrating wars for profit.”

    Of course, most if not all the wars we’ve gotten involved in over the past 20 years or so were waged in large part to advance the interests of Israel, and each one, without exception, was urged on by neocons.

    Nonetheless, a time when use of the word “neocon” will get you branded an anti-Semite may not be far off in the future.

    Speakers at this year’s AIPAC summit will include two officials from the Trump administration, Vice President Mike Pence and Nikki Haley, US ambassador to the UN; two US senators–Mitch McConnell of Kentucky and Chuck Schumer of New York; and four members of the US House of Representatives: House Speaker Paul Ryan, Nancy Pelosi and Kevin McCarthy, both of California, and Steny Hoyer of Maryland.

    I wonder if all these people would fancy themselves “patriotic Americans”? They are of course going to be speaking before an organization whose goal is to advance the interests of a foreign nation.

    Can you imagine the hue and cry if Congress members were turning up to speak before a group dedicated to promoting Russian interests?

    Additional speakers will include Isaac Herzog, Israeli politician and Knesset member, and Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, who will speak live via satellite.

    But significantly not on the list (at least as far as I can tell) is Rep. Tulsi Gabbard of Hawaii. Gabbard is the congresswoman who recently introduced the “Stop Arming Terrorists” bill.

    Perhaps people might give some thought to contacting Gabbard and encouraging her to introduce a bill to force AIPAC to register under the Foreign Agents Registration Act.

    Such a bill almost assuredly would not pass, but it would be interesting observing how those in AIPAC’s hip pocket would stand up and argue against it.

    For those who might think it worthwhile to contact Gabbard, you can do so at: or at (202) 225-4906.

    If you do contact her, please be sure and thank her for supporting the Stop Arming Terrorists Act, and ask her to please consider introducing a bill to require AIPAC to register as a foreign agent. ]

    Neocons as Figment of Imagination: Criticizing Their Thuggery is Anti-Semitism?

    By Philip Giraldi

    We have a president who is belligerent towards Iran, who is sending “boots on the ground” to fight ISIS, who loves Israel passionately and who is increasing already bloated defense budgets.

    If one were a neoconservative, what is there not to like, yet neocons in the media and ensconced comfortably in their multitude of think tanks hate Donald Trump.

    I suspect it comes down to three reasons. First, it is because Trump knows who was sticking the knife in his back during his campaign in 2016 and he has neither forgiven nor hired them.

    Nor does he pay any attention to their bleating, denying them the status that they think they deserve because of their self-promoted foreign policy brilliance.

    And second, Trump persists in his desire to “do business” with Russia. The predominantly Jewish neocons always imagine the thunder of hooves of approaching Cossacks preparing to engage in pogroms whenever they hear the word Russia.

    And this is particularly true of Vladimir Putin’s regime, which is Holy Russia revived. When not musing over how it is always 1938 and one is in Munich, neocons are nearly as unsettled when they think it is 1905 in Odessa.

    The third reason, linked to number two, is that having a plausible and dangerous enemy like Russia on tap keeps the cash flowing from defense industries to the foundations and think tanks that the neocons nest in when they are not running the Pentagon and National Security Council.

    Follow the money. So it is all about self-interest combined with tribal memory: money, status and a visceral hatred of Russia.

    The hatred of Trump runs so deep that a leading neocon Bill Kristol actually tweeted that he would prefer a country run by bureaucrats and special interests rather than the current constitutional arrangement.

    The neocon vendetta was as well neatly summed up in two recent articles by Max Boot. The first is entitled “Trump knows the Feds are closing in on him” and the second is “WikiLeaks has joined the Trump Administration.”

    In the former piece Boot asserts that “Trump’s recent tweets aren’t just conspiratorial gibberish—they’re the erratic ravings of a guilty conscience” and in the latter, that “The anti-American WikiLeaks has become the preferred intelligence service for a conspiracy-addled White House.”

    Now, who is Max Boot and why should anyone care what he writes? Russian-born, Max entered the United States with his family through a special visa exemption under the 1975 Jackson-Vanik Amendment even though they were not notably persecuted and only had to prove that they were Jewish.

    Jackson-Vanik was one of the first public assertions of neoconism, having reportedly been drafted in the office of Senator Henry Jackson by no less than Richard Perle and Ben Wattenberg as a form of affirmative action for Russian Jews.

    As refugees instead of immigrants, the new arrivals received welfare, health insurance, job placement, English language classes, and the opportunity to apply for U.S. citizenship after only five years. Max went to college at Berkeley and received an M.A. from Yale.

    Boot, a foreign policy adviser to Mitt Romney in 2012, networked his way up the neocon ladder, including writing for The Weekly Standard, Commentary, The Wall Street Journal and The Washington Post.

    He was a member of the neocon incubator Project for a New American Century and now sits on the heavily neocon Council on Foreign Relations. Boot characteristically has never served in the U.S. military but likes war a lot. In 2012 he co-authored “5 Reasons to Intervene in Syria Now.” He is a reliable Russia and Putin basher.

    Max Boot’s articles are smears of Donald Trump from top to bottom. The “closing in” piece calls for establishment of a special counsel to investigate every aspect of the Trump Team/Russian relationship.

    Along the way, it makes its case to come to that conclusion by accepting every single worst case scenario regarding Trump as true. Yes, per Boot “Putin was intervening in the presidential election to help Trump.” And President Barack Obama could not possibly have “interfered with the lawful workings of the FBI.”

    As is always the case, not one shred of evidence is produced to demonstrate that anyone associated with Donald Trump somehow became a Russian useful idiot, but Boot assumes that the White House is now being run out of the Kremlin.

    Max is certainly fun to read but on a more serious note, the National Review is working hard to make us forget about employing the expression “neocon” because it is apparently rarely understood by the people who use the term.

    Plus its implied meaning is anti-Semitic in nature, something that David Brooks in an article pretty much denying that neocons really exist suggested thirteen years ago when he postulated that it was shorthand for “Jewish conservative.”

    National Review actually searched hard to find a gentile who could write the piece, one Kevin D. Williamson, who is described as a “roving correspondent” for the magazine.

    His article is entitled “Word Games: The Right Discovers the Deep State.” Williamson begins by observing that using “neocon” disparagingly in the post-9/11 context acts either “as a kind of catalyst enabling a political reaction that revived a great many stupid and ugly myths about Jewish bankers orchestrating wars for profit…” or serves as a standby expression for a “Jew with politics I don’t like.”

    Interestingly, I have never heard the “Jewish bankers” adl fashion uae news theory or disparagement of Jewish “politics” from the many responsible critics who have been dismayed by the aberrant U.S. foreign policy that has evolved since 2001.

    I don’t know how much money Goldman Sachs has made since the World Trade Center went down and that is not really the issue, nor is the fact that Jews overwhelmingly vote Democratic, which is a party that I don’t particularly like.

    Williamson dodges the increasingly held view that America slid into the abyss when Washington declared war on the entire world and invaded Iraq based on a tissue of lies, in large part to benefit Israel, which is what matters and why the enabling role of the neocons is important.

    And one might reasonably argue that U.S. policy since that time has nearly always deferred to Israeli interests, most recently declaring its prime mission at the U.N. to be protecting Israel, then acting on that premise by forcing the resignation of a senior official who had prepared a report critical of Israel’s “apartheid” regime.

    I recognize that relatively few American Jews are neocons and that many American Jews are in the forefront in resistance to Israel’s inhumane policies, but the reality is that nearly all neocons are Jewish. And they are in your face every time you turn on the television or pick up a newspaper.

    Abrasive and abusive Professor Alan Dershowitz recently proclaimed that Jews should never apologize for Jewish power, saying that it is deserved and granted by God, but I for one think it is past time for a little pushback from the rest of us to make Washington protect American interests instead of those of Israel.

    The neocon cult has been behind the promotion of Israel as well as the serial foreign policy misadventures since 2001.

    Do the names Perle, Feith, Wolfowitz, Abrams, Edelman, Ledeen, Senor, Libby and Nuland in and around the government as well as a host of others in think tanks and lobbies like AIPAC, AEI, WINEP, PNAC, FPI, FDD, JINSA and Hudson ring a bell?

    And do the loud voices in the media to include Judith Miller, Robert Kaplan, Charles Krauthammer, Jennifer Rubin, Fred Hiatt, Bret Stephens, Bill Kristol, the Kagans and the Podhoretzes, as well as the entire Washington Post and Wall Street Journal editorial pages, suggest any connivance?

    They are all Jews and many are connected in terms of their careers, which were heavily networked from the inside to advance them up the ladder, often to include moving between government and lucrative think tank and academic positions.

    They mostly self-identify as neoconservatives and all share some significant traits, notably extreme dedication to Israel and embrace of the doctrine that the U.S. should not be shy about using military force, so it is interesting to learn from Williamson that they really do not constitute a cohesive group with shared values and interests as well as excellent access to the media and the levers of power.

    When did you last see an “expert” on the Middle East on television who was not Jewish?

    Having made his pithy comments and dismissed neoconservatism-phobes as bigots, Williamson then wanders off subject into the Deep State, which, like neoconism apparently is some kind of urban legend being propagated by the poorly informed, whom these days he identifies as Trump supporters.

    He argues that the entities that are frequently cited as the Deep State, including the neocons, actually have quite divergent interests and it is unlikely that those interests should become “identical or aligned” to enable running of the country in an essentially clandestine fashion.

    It is perhaps inevitable that Williamson is confused as he does not recognize how the American Deep State differs from that in most other countries – it is perhaps better described as the Establishment.

    Unlike in places like Turkey, it operates largely out in the open and ostensibly legally along a New York-Washington axis that constantly revitalizes itself through the revolving door allowing the entry of politicians and high government officials who create and enforce the legislation that benefits Deep State interests.

    Its components do indeed have different motives, but they come together in preserving the status quo, which benefits all parties, while little dissent comes from the Fourth Estate as the process plays out, since much of the media and many of the proliferating Washington think tanks that provide Deep State “intellectual” credibility are also part of the same malignancy.

    And yes, quite a bit of today’s Establishment is Jewish, most particularly financial and legal services, the think tanks, and academia. Many of them support or are part of the neocon persuasion and frequently also of the Israel Lobby.

    Continued here

  • KathJuliane March 29, 2017 @ 1:32 pm

    UNZ Review: Philip Giraldi

    AIPAC Is Back In Town!
    Hava Nagila, y’all

    Philip Giraldi

    Spring in Washington would not be complete without the city’s famous cherry blossoms and the annual “Policy Conference” meeting of the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC).

    The 15,000 plus participants began arriving on Sunday and will be here at the Walter E. Washington Convention Center until tomorrow morning, at which point many of them will descend on Congress like a swarm of ravenous locusts to make sure that our Solons on the Potomac are doing what is right by Israel.

    AIPAC is the most powerful foreign policy lobby in Washington. Its annual budget exceeds million plus it has an endowment of 0 million.

    It has nearly 400 employees and also supports local chapters and initiatives throughout the United States. What do all those employees do? They mostly lobby Congress and increasingly state legislatures shamelessly on behalf of a foreign country that has little in the way of actual common interests with the United States.

    When anything happens in the Middle East, AIPAC’s drones get to work, drafting up position papers detailing the Israeli position which are then placed by runners on the desks of every single congressman within a matter of hours.

    The congressmen, too lazy to engage in any real inquiry into what is going on, rely on the AIPAC research. That is, lamentably, how our system works.
    And if the congressman ignores the “expert” advice, AIPAC and its friends makes sure he or she has a strong, well-funded opponent in the next election, someone who knows how to say “I love Israel” without moving his or her lips.

    The current speakers’ list for the 2017 conference includes many of the leading political parasites that have long made the nation’s Capitol a “must miss” destination.

    I will not attempt to summarize what Michael Pence, Mitch McConnell, Chuck Schumer, Paul Ryan, Nancy Pelosi, Kevin McCarthy, Steny Hoyer and others said on Sunday night and yesterday as it was all basically the same speech, declaring undying love for Israel and the Jewish people and pledging that the United States will always have “Israel’s back,” whatever that is supposed to mean.

    Twenty-nine congressmen were featured as attendees on the AIPAC website but more than two thirds of the entire Congress is expected to appear for a photo op while muttering something about that apparently vulnerable “back.”
    Or do they mean backside? Whatever. I won’t name any more of the specific panderers as the reader probably already has a good idea who they are.

    And, of course, the redoubtable Professor Alan Dershowitz was also a featured speaker, a wonderful human being who recently told us goyim that Jewish power in this country is both deserved and granted by Jehovah.

    It is interesting how Jews among themselves boast about their power but if a gentile so much as suggests the same thing it is anti-Semitism.

    There were also two certifiable loonies among the speakers, apart from Dershowitz.

    They were Nikki Haley, America’s stalwart U.N. Ambassador, and Stephen Harper, until recently Prime Minister of Canada.

    Those who are following Haley’s meteoric career are probably aware that while governor of South Carolina she took the lead on making her state the first in the nation to legislate against the Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions movement (BDS) which supports peaceful pressure on Israel to abandon its apartheid policies when dealing with its own Arab citizens as well as the Palestinians on the West Bank and Gaza.

    Such legislation is an abrogation of First Amendment rights and will likely prove to be unconstitutional if it ever gets to the Supreme Court, but Haley clearly believed then and believes now that nothing is too good when it comes to Israel.

    Since going to the U.N., Haley has spoken more about Israel than about any possible American interests, pledging full support and protection for Netanyahu and his government.

    She blocked the appointment of a well-qualified Palestinian to a senior U.N. position purely because he was Palestinian.

    Ignorant of nearly everything that goes on in the world outside the U.S., it might be said that she is so horribly inept that she actually makes her ghastly predecessor Samantha Power look good.

    Stephen Harper is another certified knee jerker when it comes to Israel. A fundamentalist Christian who believes the second coming of Christ is imminent, while Prime Minister he led what was possibly the world’s most pro-Israeli government.

    Harper described Israel as a light that “…burns bright, upheld by the universal principles of all civilized nations – freedom, democracy justice.” He has also said “I will defend Israel whatever the cost” to Canada, an interesting proposition for those who might have believed that his duty was to protect his own country and advance its interests.

    Harper, who has received awards from both Canadian and American Jewish organizations, personally endorsed Israel’s bombing of Lebanon in 2006, calling it “measured” even when Canadian peacekeepers were killed in the bombardment.

    Paul Kagame, President of the Republic of Rwanda, also spoke at the conference.

    Why? I don’t know but it probably has something to do with characteristically liberal American Jews pulling their usual doublespeak trick, trying to pretend that fundamentally racist Israelis are not actually racist by inviting a black man to speak at a pro-Israel conference. I’ll bet he was paid handsomely to do so.

    And former British Prime Minister Tony Blair, perhaps suggesting that love for Israel is truly international, spoke and was also probably paid handsomely to do so as he an incorporated brand.

    Between 2007 and 2015 Blair was the “special envoy” representing (and personally profiting from) the Quartet seeking to bring about a peace agreement between Israel and Palestine.

    Marwan Bishara explained in The New York Times: “A natural panderer to power, Mr. Blair morphed his complicity with the United States over Iraq into a new complicity with Israel.

    “The assumption that operates is that schmoozing with the powerful is the only way to make a difference. So while Mr. Blair worked to reform the Palestinian Authority’s finances, security and governance, he turned a blind eye as Israel expanded its illegal settlements and tightened its hold on the autonomous territories.

    “In the process, Mr. Blair helped render the Palestinian Authority more, not less, dependent on Israel. Instead of protecting the Palestinians from the Israeli settlers, Palestinian security forces have since been protecting Israeli settlers from Palestinian resentment.”

    Blair also attacked the Palestinian leadership’s decision to seek United Nations recognition of the Palestinian state, calling it “deeply confrontational.”

    Bishara dismisses him as “Israel’s puppy.” As I am extremely fond of dogs, I would modify that to read “Israel and now AIPAC’s butt boy.”

    The avenging angel Benjamin Netanyahu also addressed the conference by satellite link and yet again described the threat posed by Iran. The satellite visit was somewhat surprising, as he usually likes to drop by in person so he can pick up his annual tribute money from the U.S. Treasury.

    This year’s Danegeld will be.8 billion thanks to President Barack Obama, guaranteed for ten years, and there will be, of course, various supplements as the Israelis discover things that they just need to have to stave off Netanyahu’s wily Persians and fight the rising tide of anti-Semitism.

    A rising tide, which we have just learned, was carried out by an Israeli Jew who also holds U.S. citizenship, which again leads to the question why so many Israelis are allowed to have American passports even though they live in Israel and serve in the Israeli Army?

    And, of course, Persia was an integral part of the conference as it is tough to want to destroy the entire Muslim Middle East without having a really formidable enemy to focus on.

    Iran fits the bill quite nicely, but speakers were also prone to skewer those terrible Ay-rabs who just do not want peace.

    And the Israelis settlements are not a problem, nosiree! The theme of this year’s gathering was, in fact, “Many voices, one mission,” the mission presumably being the expansion of Israel so it will stretch east to west from the Nile to the River Jordan and north to the Turkish border.

    The indigenous inhabitants will have to be removed, but as they are mostly terrorists that should be okay with the world community and Donald Trump.

    And with the 15,000 AIPAC attendees. The AIPAC gathering is really all about subverting Congress, so it is a good thing that a large majority of Congressmen were attending, making the necessary bowing and scraping that much easier.

    And they will enjoy it even more when the 15,000 AIPAC loyalists descend on Capitol Hill as the conference ends to make sure that Congress is listening. Democracy in action is great, isn’t it?

    Even though I jest about the absurdity of thousands of Americans who appeared to be confused about what country they actually live in gathering to honor a foreign country that has an army that acts like a terrorist group, does not believe in equal rights even for its own citizens and bans visitors who do not accept its more questionable policies, the AIPAC people are not a joke.

    They are a deadly serious threat to our own democracy and way of life as they have figured out how to use money and the power that money buys to leverage and corrupt the system in such a way as to produce wars and turmoil that have blown back on the United States and made every American citizen both less safe and poorer.

    I have written and spoken before how AIPAC is ultimately doomed as Israel and its basic policies towards Arabs and its neighbors are unsustainable both from a human rights and practical point of view. But that does not mean that it is going away any time soon.

    The Israel Lobby has the U.S. Congress and media by the throat and the Trump administration promises to be completely uncritical in its relationship with Netanyahu and whatever homicidal kleptocrat might be in line to succeed him.

    Ms. Haley and her peers in state governments have successfully pushed legislation in a majority of states that punishes anyone who tries to boycott Israeli institutions or products.

    On university campuses non-violent criticism of Israel is being suppressed.

    There is also increasing pressure to define any criticism of Israel as anti-Semitism and therefore a hate crime, modeled on similar legislation in Canada, Britain and France.

    In a number of European countries it is a crime to challenge the standard narrative on “the Holocaust.”

    Why should that be? You can in much of Europe stand in a town square and say horrible things about your own country but if you criticize the factual basis of one particular “event” that took place in the 1940s you will go to jail.

    So hang on to your hats, my fellow Americans. AIPAC is not going away and it will be doing all it can to keep neighboring Syria a cauldron of death and destruction while also calling for war on Iran.

    And AIPAC as well as the other bits and pieces of the Israel Lobby will have many Quislings in the Congress and U.S. media who will echo whatever they propose, even if it does grave damage to American interests.

    Meanwhile the billions and billions of dollars will continue to flow from an increasingly straitened United States to a wealthy Israel.

    At its conference AIPAC announced the latest windfall from America, applauding “… the U.S. House of Representatives for significantly bolstering its support of U.S.-Israel missile defense cooperation in the FY 2017 defense appropriations bill. The House appropriated 0.7 million for U.S.-Israel missile defense programs.”

    That is on top of everything else Israel gets. Will it ever end? I don’t know.

  • KathJuliane March 29, 2017 @ 7:11 pm


    Zyklon-B Deliveries to Auschwitz
    Neither Proof nor Trace
    Carlo Mattogno


    Already during the Nuremberg postwar trials, the huge amount of Zyklon-B deliveries to the infamous Auschwitz Camp were seen as evidence for homicidal activities on a large scale in that camp.

    Revisionists, on the other hand, have maintained that this insecticide was used only to combat vermin in the struggle against epidemics.

    In a 2011 article, Piotr Setkiewicz, currently the research director of the Auschwitz Museum, tried to dismiss this revisionist claim as a myth by attempting to prove that the amount of Zyklon B delivered cannot be explained merely by its use for fumigations.

    The following paper, which is an excerpt from an upcoming book, analyzes the Auschwitz Museum’s hypothesis and juxtaposes it with the documented facts.

    It shows not only that Setkiewicz grossly miscalculated the a mount of Zyklon B delivered, but also misrepresented the amount of Zyklon B the camp would have needed to suppress the typhus epidemic raging inside the Auschwitz camp for some two years.


    This is a slightly adapted extract of the upcoming book Deliveries of Coke, Wood and Zyklon B to Auschwitz: Neither Proof Nor Trace for the Holocaust by Carlo Mattogno.

    In 2011, an important article was published by Piotr Setkiewicz, director of the Research Center at the Auschwitz Museum, which bears the title “The Supply of Materials to the Crematoria and Gas Chambers at Auschwitz: Coke, Wood, Zyklon.”

    His exposition far surpasses all previous discussions on the topic by orthodox Holocaust historians (especially the rather frivolous one by van Pelt 2002), and also raises what appear to be certain not insignificant problems. It therefore deserves to be examined more carefully.

    Setkiewicz highlights the lack of documentary evidence in relation to the alleged mass extermination at Auschwitz, noting:

    “The extensive research carried out in recent years on this important documentation has contributed to the sum of knowledge on the subject of the gas chambers and crematoria at Auschwitz, but it has not helped to resolve all contentious issues,”

    so that, regardless of the testimonies, the confessions, and the few documents,

    “our direct knowledge of the full extent of the Extermination is derived mainly from the obvious conclusion that if on any given day many more prisoners were brought into the camp than were registered, then the remaining number were undoubtedly killed.” (Setkiewicz 2011, p. 48)

    This is, however, only the same dubious method used by Danuta Czech in the preparation of her Auschwitz Chronicle (Czech 1989).

    Yet Setkiewicz wants to go beyond this by analyzing documents previously ignored by the Auschwitz Museum which should provide new evidence.

    In fact, his article is an indirect response to the revisionist arguments, especially with regard to supplies of coke to the crematoria of Auschwitz-Birkenau; it is an indirect response to such an extent that the revisionist arguments are never explicitly mentioned.

    In response I have written a study is a direct response to Setkiewicz’s arguments, objections and explanations, each of which I have analyze individually and then as a whole.

    This book is currently being translated into English and is slated to appear under the title Auschwitz: Deliveries of Coke, Wood and Zyklon B—Neither Proof Nor Trace for the Holocaust later this year as Volume 40 of the prestigious series Holocaust Handbooks.

    Below is Chapter III of my response dealing directly with the issue of Zyklon B deliveries to the Auschwitz Camp.

  • Irene Bonney Faulkes March 29, 2017 @ 7:29 pm

    Bravo, Brother Nathanael, You join the ranks of such as St. Peter.

    I am quoting from the Acts of St. Peter. These Acts were read by Orthodox Christians. Their words truly point to that Apostle.

    We remember him as the one to whom Jesus said: ‘Get behind me, Satan’. Then before the crucifixion, as Jesus said: ‘Peter, Satan has desired to have you’. This was allowed by the Lord and Peter denied Him with cursing, three times.

    Peter says in his epistle: ‘The devil goes about like a roaring lion, seeking whom he may devour’. ‘Resist the devil and he will flee from you’.

    In the Acts of Peter, on one occasion he addresses Satan:

    ‘Let your blackness turn against you; let your wickedness turn against you. Depart from the servants of Christ and from those who will serve in His army’.

    The opposition in man is against you and us, dear Brother but those men are full of Satan and his demons. ‘Greater is He who is in you (and me) than he (Satan) who is in the world’.

    On another occasion, this was Peter, that impulsive, often cowardly and Satan controlled Peter. He addresses Satan:

    ‘I say that I believe on the living God of whom I will give you proofs..
    My name is Peter, because the Lord Jesus had the grace to call me to be ready for every cause’

    For I believe in the living God, through whom I shall destroy your magical arts.’

    You, dear Brother are standing as Peter eventually did.

    Our enemies are not flesh and blood but according to the Eastern-Greek Orthodox New Testament are: ‘Truly, our struggle is not against flesh and blood but against the principalities, against the powers, against the world rulers of this darkness and against the evil spiritual forces in the supernatural realms’, Ephesians 6:11.

    This provides a clearer understanding than does the King James Version.

    Source New Testament writes it like this: ‘Rather it is governments, authorities, a powerful class of demon-gods that inhabit the darkness, and evil spirit entities - these are in the heavenly places’.

    Therein lies our battle. These demons in our enemies make strong and successful efforts to control all churches and Christians, as they are doing in hundreds of millions in our Evangelical, Pentecostal, Charismatic and Fundamental Churches.

    They have brought utter darkness in relation to their End-time myths. The demons control these multitudes of pastors, leaders, Bible School, Seminary scholars. The battle is spiritual and not of the flesh. We must fight. We must stand against it. We must preach the truth. Am so glad you are hanging on in there, dear Brother.

    Should we be surprised at the incessant worship those millions accord their mythical Israel that is not the Old Testament Israel. It is most revealing on their Christian (?) Chat Shows. Utter worship of these falsely supposed ‘people of God’ the ones these Christians bless, finance and exalt above Christ. Rank heresy and Satanism with submission to them and to the vast army of demons under Satan.

    As supporters we all should join with Brother Nathanael in doing what St. Peter did. Also, we must put on the whole armor of God and we stand against the Devil. We command these demons to leave us alone in our joining with our Brother in the promotion of the Truths of the Word of God with regard to the gospel. We win the fight and maintain the defeat of the enemies of Christ.

    Will all disappear? Maybe, maybe not and that is not the point. It is that we have been given as Jesus said:

    ‘See, I have given you authority to tread upon serpents and scorpions, and upon all the powers of the enemy and nothing shall hurt you’, Luke 10:19.

    Jesus said this to the seventy-two apostles He sent out. He was referring to the Scribes and Pharisees of Babylonian Judaism. They were subtle and full of poisonous venom. To tread or trample on them meant the apostles would have a total victory. So must we.

    Such are our enemies. Let those who believe, follow along with Brother Nathanael in his actions of prayer and faith, being victorious over these enemies of Christ and of us.

  • KathJuliane March 29, 2017 @ 7:54 pm

    It’s always the Goyim’s fault.

    No matter how rude, obnoxious, foul-mouthed, abusive, interruptive, lying, deceitful and exaggerated the Jewish story-telling, it’s the Goy’s fault for not getting the “emotional experience” of the Jew or understanding his “Jewish conversational style,” and getting fed up when the Goy can’t get a word in edgewise.

    If the Goy gets frustrated and says something about Jewish rudeness, or gripes “Stop interrupting me,” then they are an “anti-Semite.”

    This next gave me a good laugh. It’s not really deliberate obnoxiousness on the part of an arrogant and pushy Jew, which is entirely cultivated as a part of national identity, particularly in Israel, it’s simply a misunderstanding of the “Jewish conversation style”.

    Yes, but telling a fictious story about the Holocaust is still a lie, no matter what your “conversational style” is, foolish Jews.

    I came across this chapter from an online book written by a couple of Jewish rabbis:




    11. There is a Jewish conversational style.

    It is widely accepted that different ethnic groups have distinctive and meaningful patterns of conversational style that are known – almost intuitively – to their members. Jews are no exception.

    The patterns of conversation that are found among most Jews, especially those of Eastern European origin, differ in significant ways from patterns of conversation found among most non-Jews in America.

    For example: experienced from the “outside,” non-Jewish listeners often notice that Jewish speakers tend to interrupt the flow of a conversation and therefore, judge them as being rude.

    In that same conversation – but experienced from the “inside” - those same Jewish speakers perceive that they are engaged and are actively and respectfully participating.

    Georgetown University Professor Deborah Tannen [Jewish of course], an internationally acclaimed expert in linguistics, calls this normative Jewish behavior “high-involvement” and “cooperative overlapping.”

    She affirms - what Jewish speakers basically know intuitively - that talking as another person continues to talk is one way that Jews show interest and appreciation.

    Also typical of Jewish conversational style are: a faster rate of speech, faster turn-taking among speakers, abrupt shifts of topics, persistence in reintroducing a topic if others do not immediately notice it, unhesitating introduction of new topics, and a preference for personal topics.34

    Tannen further affirms that the very sounds of Jewish-style talk, including: pitch shifts, volume changes, and voice quality and accent exaggerations signal empathy and concern even as they reinforce a shared ethnic (and sometimes, a regional) background.

    In conversation, Jews find all of these conversational modalities unremarkable.

    Tannen notes that “You show you’re a good person by demonstrating enthusiastic participation in the conversation. You offer talk as a gift.”35

    Jews also tend to tell stories in their conversations, often in rounds.

    Instead of stating the point of a story directly, Jews often dramatize it through another story while focusing upon the emotional experience of that story.

    Those whose backgrounds promote different ways of conversing may not “get the point” of these story-telling rounds that sometimes seem not to have a plot. They also may find the expression -and implied expectation - of personal revelation unnerving and intrusive.

    Unfortunately, the very characteristics that promote good communication within one group can create a “style disconnect” within mixed groups.

    For example, the same “high-involvement” and “cooperative overlapping” that are so welcome and positively interpreted within Jewish groups often put-off those who are used to more restrained and less expressive ways of speaking.

    According to Tannen, “overlap is used cooperatively … as a way of showing enthusiasm and interest, but it is interpreted by [outsiders] as just the opposite: evidence of lack of attention.”36

    On the other side of the coin, some ethnic or regional groups value pauses and silence as evidence of respect while Jews tend to interpret these conversational modalities as evidence of lack of rapport and/or interest.

    Beyond this, people often make erroneous judgments about the personality of individuals who express themselves according to their normative ethnic (and regional) conversational styles.

    Tannen points out that negative stereotypes of “pushy New York Jews” may owe considerably more to clashing linguistic patterns than to character flaws.

    She explains that in her research, she “found out that New York Jews have ways of talking that often have one effect (a good one) when used with one another and another effect (not so good) when used with others.

    Of course, some New Yorkers who are not of East European Jewish background talk this way, and so do people who are neither from New York nor Jewish. But there are many who do - enough to account for the negative stereotype.”37

    See? It’s anti-Semitic to insist that a Jew carry on a proper, respectful, and civil conversation or debate.

  • KathJuliane March 30, 2017 @ 7:03 pm

    The Jewish Thought Police branch of the Israeli Strategic Affairs Ministry are at it again.

    Keep it up, you Hasbara Jewbots!

    Foreign tourism to Israel, no matter what juicy tourist packages Tel Aviv cooks up, has declined since 2014 when the terrorist Jewish state launched Operation Protective Edge on Gaza.

    Probably the only ones keeping the tourist rates afloat in your Rogue Terrorist State are American Jews, the deluded Judaizers and Zio-christians, and Sodomites.

    I read awhile back that your tourist marketing campaign to American Hispanics didn’t work out so well.

    The more jackasses like you act up, the more people will wake up to the fact that we Americans are being mentally colonized by Jews, and the more they won’t want anything to do with the “apartheid state” where one people, the Jews, are under Israeli law (hodgepodge that it is), and the other people, the Palestinian Arabs, are under military law, and have been for 70 years.

    Anti-Zionist Nationalism = Anti-Semitism? In your dreams. The Jewspeak might work for awhile, but then, people just get tired of your endless and vain repetitions.

    BDS must be working pretty good, or else you wicked clowns wouldn’t have declared war on academia.

    I can’t wait for the pages of history to turn so that I can finally read that the Zionist state is no more, having imploded because your own stupid, selfish, cunning, narcissistic evil backfired on you.

    Jewish Group Releases Blacklist of U.S. Professors Who Back Academic Boycott of Israel

    AMCHA’s list, which includes hundreds of names, comes weeks after Israel barred entry to supporters of boycott. ‘Knesset travel ban is toothless, unless there are lists,’ professor says.

    Barely three weeks after the Knesset passed controversial legislation that would deny entry into Israel to any foreigners who publicly support a boycott of the country, a small but vocal Jewish organization that fights anti-Israel activism on American college campuses published a list Wednesday of all the professors in the United States who have ever called for an academic boycott of Israel.

    The AMCHA Initiative, which operates out of the University of California Santa Cruz, unveiled several interactive maps designed to give viewers what it said was “the ability to visually understand the distribution and geographical patterns of anti-Semitic activity on U.S. college and university campuses.”

    One of these maps, the “Interactive Academic Boycotters Map,” identifies with different colored markers the institutions of higher education in the United States with faculty who support an academic boycott of Israel.

    The universities are divided into categories according to the number of boycott supporters they employ. Each category is assigned a different colored marker.

    By clicking on any marker on the map, a viewer can obtain a list of all the names of faculty members who have signed a public document endorsing the academic boycott of Israel. The list only provides names and not department affiliations. It does not specify what documents the faculty members signed.

    The universities with the largest number of boycott supporters, according to the interactive map, are both in the California state system: UC Berkeley with 47 names on its list and UC Davis with 46. Altogether, the lists contain hundreds of names.

    Among the other interactive maps published by the AMCHA Initiative today is one called “The BDS Scorecard Map,” which documents the voting results of campus BDS resolutions dating back to 2012.

    The AMCHA Initiative, founded in 2011, is a non-profit that monitors anti-Semitic and anti-Israel activities on U.S. university and college classes.

    A year ago, the University of California became the first public university in the United States to issue a statement condemning anti-Semitism on its campuses, though it stopped short of a blanket denunciation of anti-Zionism.

    The AMCHA Initiative was the driving force behind this landmark declaration. The group has frequently come under attack, however, for conflating anti-Semitism with condemnation of Israel.

    “The anti-Semitism plaguing our nation’s colleges and universities continues to grow,” said Tammi Rossman-Benjamin, AMCHA Initiative founder and director, in a statement.

    “One of AMCHA’s main goals, one we take very seriously, is documenting and exposing the threat. We hope these new education and research tools will prove helpful to advocacy organizations, government officials, university administrators, researchers and concerned parents, students and university stakeholders.”

    Lila Corwin-Berman, a professor of Jewish studies at Temple University and a leading activist in the newly formed Jewish Studies Activists Network, expressed shock at the publication of the list of academic boycotters.

    “It’s not new to create these kinds of lists of so-called enemies of the Jewish people who are professors – but this initiative seems to me to be technologically more sophisticated. It puts information into a form that allows people to believe that certain universities are bastions of anti-Semitism.”

    The timing of its publication, she speculated, was not coincidental. “The Knesset travel ban on boycott supporters is toothless, unless there are lists,” said Corwin-Berman.

    “This initiative hands a potential list to the Israeli government and seems to be working in tandem with efforts to conflate any boycott ideas with anti-Semitism.”

    The AMCHA Intiative, which considers all initiatives to boycott Israel anti-Semitism, has long been treated with suspicion by Jewish-American progressives.

    In a letter published in The Forward in Octobers 2014, many prominent Jewish studies scholars denounced the organization for urging Jewish students to avoid taking classes with a long list of Middle East studies scholars it had compiled, whom it deemed anti-Zionist or anti-Semitic.

    “Its technique of monitoring lectures, symposia and conferences strains the basic principle of academic freedom on which the American university is built,” they wrote.

    “Moreover, its definition of anti-Semitism is so undiscriminating as to be meaningless. Instead of encouraging openness through its efforts, AMCHA’s approach closes off all but the most narrow intellectual directions and has a chilling effect on research and teaching.

    AMCHA’s methods lend little support to Israel, whose very survival depends on free, open, and vigorous debate about its future.”

    Inside the Clandestine World of Israel’s ‘BDS-busting’ Ministry

    The Strategic Affairs Ministry’s leaders see themselves as the heads of a commando unit, gathering and disseminating information about ’supporters of the delegitimization of Israel’ – and they prefer their actions be kept secret.

    The Haaretz report that Minister Gilad Erdan wants to set up a database of Israeli citizens who support the BDS movement has led to questions about the boundaries of freedom of expression and the government’s use of its resources to surveille people of differing opinions.

    The report also shone a light on the Strategic Affairs Ministry, which Erdan heads, and cast doubt about its ambiguous activities and goals.

    Now, through official documents, Haaretz reveals some elements of the ministry’s clandestine activities, whereby even its location is a secret, described only as “greater Tel Aviv.”

    Its internal terminology comes from the world of espionage and security; its leading figures appear to see themselves as the heads of a public affairs commando unit engaged in multiple fronts, gathering and disseminating information about people they define as “supporters of the delegitimization of Israel.”

    That definition does not necessarily include only supporters of BDS, but intentional ambiguity remains, alongside campaigns and public diplomacy activities against these individuals in Israel and abroad.

    The ministry spends tens of millions of shekels on cooperative efforts with the Histadrut labor federation, the Jewish Agency and various nongovernmental organizations in training representatives of the “true pluralistic face” of Israel in various forums.

    The Strategic Affairs Ministry was established mainly as a consolation prize for ministers when the need arose to pad them with a semi-security portfolio during the formation of governing coalitions, and has taken on various forms.

    It was founded in 2006 as a portfolio tailored to Avigdor Lieberman. It was dismantled two years later and reestablished in 2009 in a different format. Under each ministry it was given new meaning and content.

    Much more:

  • Brother Nathanael March 30, 2017 @ 11:07 pm

    Truth-Hating PayPal Bans Brother Nathanael
    With Special UPDATED Commentary By Brother Nathanael Below

    March 29, 2017
    To PayPal,

    It appears there has been a mistake in regards to limiting my PayPal account. I have had a PayPal account for my 501(c)(3) Christian ministry for many years without issue.

    Can you please correct the issue?

    +Brother Nathanael Kapner
    PayPal Appeal Denied
    March 29, 2017

    As indicated in our letter to you of March 28, 2017, your account was permanently limited following our recent review of your account usage. We regrettably are not able to provide you with information about the basis of that action beyond what is included in our initial letter.

    PayPal Brand Risk Management
    Initial PayPal Letter
    March 28, 2017

    “We have recently reviewed your usage of PayPal’s services, as reflected in
    our records and on your website Due
    to the nature of your activities, we have chosen to discontinue service to
    you in accordance with PayPal’s User Agreement. As a result, we have
    placed a permanent limitation on your account.

    Please remove all references to PayPal from your website.
    This includes removing PayPal as a payment option, as well as the PayPal

    PayPal Brand Risk Management
    UPDATED COMMENTARY by +Brother Nathanael

    PayPal is owned by the Jew, Daniel Shulman. This is what the world has come to. Jews own EVERYTHING now and if the Jewish script is opposed then you are “hateful” and “intolerant.”

    If a small Christian bakery denies service to a homosexual couple for a wedding cake it is targeted as “hateful” and “discriminatory.”

    But if a JEW-OWNED corporation (Dan Shulman owns PayPal…what don’t Jews own?) it is defended as a private entity’s “right to denial of service.”

    Not only this, but because JEWS are so FILTHY RICH and OWN EVERYTHING, they can afford to lose money (yes they made money off of donations to me these past seven years) if they see their wicked agenda is EXPOSED.

    AND, not only this, it is “Tanya” who notified me and denied my appeal. What does that tell you? That a GOY does the dirty work of the Jew masters. THIS is what the world has come to. The GOYS do the dirty work of the wicked, truth-hating, free speech-denying JEWS.

    And notice that she concludes her Jew-enabled hatchet job on Truth by saying, “Sincerely, Tanya.” Two things here.

    When Jews wish to destroy your career they do it SINCERELY, whether directly or through a goy shill.

    AND when Jews are about to kill you off they do it with all the proper protocol of politeness. But murder by any other entree spills blood the same.

    +Brother Nathanael Kapner
    The Brother Nathanael Foundation @

  • KathJuliane March 31, 2017 @ 9:39 am

    These days what with intelligence satellites and all, once a US troop deployment is initiated, then basically the entire world knows how many US troops and their obvious logistics are enroute their destination points, particularly ISIS or whatever enemy du jour, except for the American people.

    And that’s the whole point. Trump wants to maintain a strategic silence about troop deployment to illegal wars in order to maintain an “element of surprise” over the enemy.

    Yes indeedy, it’s an “element of surprise” for the American people, not for the “enemy”, unless Americans are the enemy.

    It’s the same reason why the Jew media does not show what the Zionist monsters do to the Palestinians in the way of bodily harm and destruction on a daily basis in the Occupied Territory under military law, and when the Israeli military decides to “mow the grass” in Gaza every couple of years in a controlled rampage.

    It’s to keep Americans in the dark. Seeing civilian and troop casualties and atrocities on TV might be “triggering”.

    Yes, “triggering” an anti-war protest, just as what happened with the massive protests in the Viet Nam era which mobilized not just radicals, but folks from Middle America to demand an end to the war.

    In 1982, I remember routine and daily national TV war footage on the news shows from Israel’s invasion of Lebanon and horrific images of the destruction they caused.

    Again in Israel’s invasion of Lebanon in 2006, and the massive destruction the Jews inflicted splashed across TVs in America and around the world.

    The horrors of Operation Cast Lead (December 27 2008-January 18, 2009)remain indelibly etched in the minds of all Gazans, and mine.

    For 22 days the Gazans were closed in and relentlessly attacked, while the world watched as war crimes were broadcast live on television. At the end of the offensive over 1,400 Palestinians were dead; 82 percent of them - the overwhelming majority - were innocent civilians.

    The Jews rained down white phosphorous on Gaza City day and night, causing huge suffering and death to families, indiscriminately bombarded them with artillery, drone attacks killed only civilians and children, bulldozers and explosive charges razed blocks of homes in the Gaza Strip.

    The Israeli Occupation Forces attacked Gaza again in 2012 and in 2014. And, during Operation Cast Lead and since then, attacks on Gaza have become a Jewish spectator sport, complete with tailgate parties in the hills overlooking Gaza.

    These aren’t covert special forces being deployed into Syria uninvited, but full battlefield battalions, complete with trucks, troop transport vehicles, artillery, and whatever else.

    So ISIS knew the moment the military transport aircraft landed in Incerlik, or Syrian and Iraqi airbases, if not warned beforehand, as did Turkey, the FSA, the Saudi-led coalition, and the US-backed, Kurdish-led SDA.

    Trump complained about how Obama would announce troop deployments in advance, and “warning the enemy”. Be that as it may, it also helped tipped civilians in affected areas, and they would have a chance to flee, if physically possible.

    Now, the White House is blacking out troop deployments altogether to keep the people from knowing how many American casualties will follow, and suppressing the fact that civilian casualties have increased exponentially in Iraq and Syria due to US-led coalition strikes.

    Trump the militarist doesn’t want the average American to know that he is escalating aggression illegally in Syria, all in the name of “American interests,” which of course actually means, “protecting Israel”.

    LA Times: Trump administration stops disclosing troop deployments in Iraq and Syria

    ven as the U.S. military takes on a greater role in the warfare in Iraq and Syria, the Trump administration has stopped disclosing significant information about the size and nature of the U.S. commitment, including the number of U.S. troops deployed in either country.

    Earlier this month, the Pentagon quietly dispatched 400 Marines to northern Syria to operate artillery in support of Syrian militias that are cooperating in the fight against Islamic State, according to U.S. officials. That was the first use of U.S. Marines in that country since its long civil war began.

    In Iraq, nearly 300 Army paratroopers were deployed recently to help the Iraqi military in their six-month assault on the city of Mosul, according to U.S. officials.

    Neither of those deployments was announced once they had been made, a departure from the practice of the Obama administration, which announced nearly all conventional force deployments.

    The decision appears to be making good on Trump’s promise as a candidate to insist on more of an “element of surprise” in battle tactics.

    “In order to maintain tactical surprise, ensure operational security and force protection, the coalition will not routinely announce or confirm information about the capabilities, force numbers, locations, or movement of forces in or out of Iraq and Syria,” said Eric Pahon, a Pentagon spokesman.

    That move deprives the public of information it has a right to know about the wars in which the U.S. is engaging, said Ned Price, National Security Council spokesman under Obama.

    “The position of the Obama administration was that the American people had a right to know if servicemen and women were in harm’s way,” he said.

    “It’s truly shocking that the current administration furtively deploys troops without public debate or describing their larger strategy.”

    In addition to the number of troops being larger, American forces are now nearer to the front lines in both Iraq and Syria than they have been since the war against Islamic State began nearly three years ago.

    The deployment of Marines to Syria was confirmed for the first time publicly this week by Gen. Joseph Votel, the top commander in the Middle East, in response to a question at a congressional hearing from a member of the House Armed Services committee who asked whether there were additional Americans inside the country.

    “They have deployed,” Votel said, adding that there were likely more troops headed for deployment.

    Under the Obama administration, Pentagon policy was to announce conventional deployments after they occurred. That administration even took the unusual step of revealing in 2015 that 200 special operations forces — whose missions often are classified — had been sent to Syria.

    That’s now changed, according to Pentagon officials.

    “The coalition commander’s intent is that ISIS be first to know about any additional capabilities the coalition or our partner forces may present them on the battlefield,” Pahon said, using an acronym for Islamic State.

    Even when news of a deployment leaks, officials will confirm only the broad description of the unit size being deployed — such as a brigade, which can be between 3,200 and 4,000 troops.

    The military does reveal what’s been dubbed a “force management level” — the number of full-time troops deployed, which is currently about 5,200 in Iraq and 500 in Syria. Pentagon officials acknowledge, however, that the number significantly understates the size of the U.S. troop presence because it does not include troops that are deployed on what the military considers a “temporary basis.”

    More than 1,000 troops are currently in the two countries in that status, which applies to troops deployed for less than about six months and security personnel. The count also excludes civilian contractors, several thousand of whom are in Iraq and Syria.

    The Obama administration created and used the force management level in a way that undercounted U.S. forces, although it did announce most deployments.

    There were exceptions. Staff Sgt. Louis F. Cardin, 27, of Temecula, died on March 19 2016 after coming under Islamic State rocket fire in northern Iraq. At the time of Cardin’s death, the U.S. military had not disclosed the presence of American troops in the region, raising questions about the Obama administration’s transparency.

    Michael E. O’Hanlon, a military analyst at the nonpartisan Brookings Institution in Washington, said limiting announcements of incremental deployments could be justified to avoid giving information to hostile forces.

    “Broad contours of an operation should be debated openly, and publicly understood, but specific raids or other modest changes in capabilities and deployments should not be telegraphed in advance,” he said.

    But officials of previous administrations said that approach limits debate over military policy.

    “Syria is a complicated environment, so if you’re sending Americans in harm’s way over there, people need to know what the overarching goal is,” said Lawrence Korb, a former assistant secretary of Defense under President Reagan and current fellow at the Center for American Progress Action Fund.

    “It’s important to have a public debate,” he said. “Congress must have a role in deciding what happens next, otherwise this is a slippery slope.”

    Congress has not debated the additional deployments, and the Trump administration has yet to explain what its longer-term policy is for Iraq or Syria.

    In the absence of a specific authorization for use of troops in those two countries, the Pentagon for years has been relying on legal authority granted by Congress in 2001 to combat Al Qaeda and its affiliates. That authorization predated the existence of the Islamic State by more than a decade.

    Defense Secretary James N. Mattis told Congress last week that he favored a more specific authorization.

    “I think it would be a statement of the American people’s resolve if you did so,” he said.

    Some members of Congress have raised concerns about the deployments.

    Rep. Niki Tsongas (D-Mass.) told Votel she was concerned that additional deployments may lead to an “expansive, open-ended commitment” in Syria.

    Sen. Bob Corker (R-Tenn.), chairman of the Foreign Relations Committee, said Thursday that a new use of force authorization could be up for debate once the White House settles on its strategy for combating Islamic State.

    “They’re developing an ISIS strategy. They sent one to the president a month ago; he hasn’t accepted it. When they finish that, we plan to have hearings on all of these issues,” Corker said. “My guess is after that, we may in fact try and do an AUMF,” he said, referring to an authorization for use of military force.

    Sen. Thom Tillis (R-N.C.), a member of the Armed Services Committee, said the appetite in Congress has grown for taking a fresh look at the issue.

    “The world’s changed a bit,” Tillis said. “The nature of the threat’s changed too.”

    That would be an important step, said Sen. Tom Udall (D-N.M.).

    “I do not think it is right for the U.S. military to become involved in the Syrian civil war based on the 9/11 AUMF,” he said. “I voted for that AUMF as a House member. I never imagined that vote being used to justify U.S. ground troops in Syria in the year 2017. And I don’t think anyone else who voted in favor of it did either.”

  • KathJuliane March 31, 2017 @ 11:02 am

    Must see:

    This streaming educational documentary is well worth the.00 to rent it on Vimeo for 48 hours. It underscores everything that dear +BN has been revealing for years.

    It is a complete history of Israeli Hasbara and the manipulation of the American public mind and perception and the failure of Western media. It is quite therapeutic in the care and washing of the brain to clear out cobwebs and dead spiders for spring cleaning.

    Although there are some leftist Jews who appear in this documentary, truth has no sides when it comes to Israel and it’s unjust, murderous military occupation of, and war on, Palestinian Arabs it holds prisoner.

    What the documentary makers reveal about Israel’s Ministry of Truth Hasbarah apparatus and its evolution is spot on, the Israel Lobby, and how they own the political class.

    At the bottom is a link to the Propaganda handbook which the dough-boy looking American Jew, Frank Lunz developed for Israel’s propaganda and its cult of media and political elites.

    The Occupation of the American Mind: Israel’s Public Relations War in the United States

    Israel’s ongoing military occupation of Palestinian territory and repeated invasions of the Gaza strip have triggered a fierce backlash against Israeli policies virtually everywhere in the world — except the United States. The Occupation of the American Mind takes an eye-opening look at this critical exception, zeroing in on pro-Israel public relations efforts within the U.S.

    Narrated by Roger Waters and featuring leading observers of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict and U.S. media culture, the film explores how the Israeli government, the U.S. government, and the pro-Israel lobby have joined forces, often with very different motives, to shape American media coverage of the conflict in Israel’s favor.

    From the U.S.-based public relations campaigns that emerged in the 1980s to today, the film provides a sweeping analysis of Israel’s decades-long battle for the hearts, minds, and tax dollars of the American people in the face of widening international condemnation of its increasingly right-wing policies.

    The Israel Project’s 2009


    The only thing I didn’t like about this documentary was Black Lives Matter appropriating as their own the 100 years of suffering, misery, and resistance of the Palestinian people.

    There is absolutely no comparison of how good BLM actually has it here in America compared to what the Palestinians, the Syrians, the Libyans, the Iraqis, the Yemenis, the Afghanis, the Southeast Asians and the Latin American countries have suffered from Jewmerican imperialism.

  • KathJuliane March 31, 2017 @ 4:51 pm

    Introducing the Megillah AIPAC for this year’s Purim

    The Jewish Forward: AIPAC Reflects Heroism Of Jewish Power — And Its Perils

    It’s fitting that the AIPAC Policy Conference, which convened this week in Washington, D.C., falls every year at around the same time as the holiday of Purim. Because the two have a lot in common.

    On Purim, Jews read the [Jewish version] Book of Esther, which tells the story of a Jew who unexpectedly gains influence with a mighty king. She learns that a wicked man named Haman threatens her people with destruction.

    Since her status may afford her some protection, she has the option to remain silent. But she does not. She uses her power to foil the wicked man’s plot and save her people.

    That’s also the story of the American Israel Public Affairs Committee. American Jews are Esther. They have won influence with the most powerful government on earth.

    They could keep their heads down, focusing only on preserving their own safety and privilege. But wicked men threaten other Jews — the Jews of Israel — with destruction.

    So America’s Esthers, via AIPAC, use their influence to ensure Israel’s survival. Thus, American Jews transform their power into heroism.

    It’s a particularly compelling narrative for American Jews old enough to remember a time when their community did not wield so much power and did not act so heroically in the face of Jewish destruction.

    If you’re a 70-year-old old at AIPAC, your parents were middle-aged when Hitler ruled Germany. Back then, American Jewish organizations did not summon half the members of Congress to conferences where they dined on kosher food and proclaimed their solidarity with the Jewish people.

    In the 1930s and ’40s, American Jews were, by today’s standards, culturally marginal and politically timid. They lacked both the power and the will to behave like Esther.

    AIPAC affords their children and grandchildren the chance to redeem that failure. “If we had AIPAC in the ‘30s and ‘40s, we would have saved millions of Jews,” declared David Steiner, AIPAC president, in 1991. “But Jews were afraid to open their mouths. They didn’t know how.”

    There’s another, less obvious parallel between the AIPAC Policy Conference and Purim. In one of the Book of Esther’s most remarkable moments, Mordechai — Esther’s surrogate father, who faces death for refusing to bow down to Haman — warns his daughter against believing that by remaining silent she can save herself.

    Don’t think that you will escape just because you are in the king’s house, Mordechai instructs. You and your father’s house will be destroyed, too.

    There are two ways to read Mordechai’s warning. Neither the King nor Haman know that Esther is a Jew. Mordechai may be suggesting that if she remains silent, Haman will eventually discover her identity and murder her, too.

    Or, less obviously, perhaps Mordechai is suggesting that if Esther remains silent, and abandons her people, she and her father’s house will be destroyed not through genocide but through assimilation.

    Esther, after all, has already taken the name of a Persian goddess, Ishtar. And she has married a Persian man.

    The Jews of AIPAC know there are many intermarried American Jews with names like Mary and Christopher. And they worry almost as much about their assimilation as they worry about Israel’s destruction.

    AIPAC offers an answer to that too. Like Mordechai speaking to Esther, it tells American Jews that by protecting the Jewish people, they will also secure their own survival.

    Why remain Jewish in the highly assimilated America of 2017? Because Israel needs you, and by safeguarding it, you can be a hero.

    At the end of the Book of Esther’s seventh chapter, Haman is hanged. But the story doesn’t end. With the King’s blessing, the Jews take revenge, killing 75,000 of Haman’s people.

    Many rabbinic commentators justify this as self-defense. But Haman is already dead and the Jews now enjoy the King’s protection.

    As Rabbi Jill Jacobs has noted, the text offers no evidence that with the political situation turned upside down, Haman’s people still represent a threat. Moreover, the Jews are instructed to kill not only men but also “little ones and women.”

    As if to reinforce the message, Jews on the Shabbat before Purim read a section from the book of Samuel in which King Saul is commanded to “slay both man and woman, infant and suckling” of the Amalakites, from whom Haman’s people descend.

    The Book of Esther, in other words, imagines power not only as necessary, but also as perilous.

    It can be used heroically, and it can be used horrifically. It can guarantee Jewish survival and it can threaten the survival of others. It is a blessing and a responsibility and a danger.

    AIPAC, by contrast, does not wrestle with Jewish power. It celebrates it to the point of intoxication.

    At its conference this week in Washington, it encourages Jews to drink it in until they cannot distinguish between 1938 and 2017, between the liquidation of the Warsaw Ghetto and the dismantling of a settlement in the West Bank, between our right to exist and our right to oppress.

    If your Book of Esther doesn’t have the word “God” in it, or Mordechai and Esther’s prayers, you have the Hebrew/Jewish version translated into English via Latin.

    The Greek Septuagint of Esther according to the text used by the Church of Greece & English translation by L.C.L. Brenton, published side by side:

  • Irene Bonney Faulkes March 31, 2017 @ 8:32 pm

    To KathJuliane,

    May I commend you on yours regarding the Feast of Purim and AIPAC. The Book of Esther’s alteration in our English King James Version should be noted by all who go to our churches. You show Brenton’s Septuagint and also the Greek Orthodox Study Bible with its Septuagint is a very good translation.

    In relation to AIPAC, the Jewish Forward author stated:

    ‘It’s a particularly compelling narrative for American Jews old enough to remember a time when their community did not wield so much power and did not act so heroically in the face of Jewish destruction.

    ‘If you’re a 70-year-old old at AIPAC, your parents were middle-aged when Hitler ruled Germany. Back then, American Jewish organizations did not summon half the members of Congress to conferences where they dined on kosher food and proclaimed their solidarity with the Jewish people.’

    It is most apparent to all true observers and researchers that it has always been the English speaking race to the fore in relation to Zionism. Such love of Zionism and its complete Jewish over a race has never occurred in the annals of history. There is not a peoples in the continent of Europe that has been so enslaved.

    It cannot be said in relation to any other nation, except the U.S.A. as it is called on this site; Jewmerica.

    We of English descent do have legendary stories that reveal, as an example, the belief that Jewish people arrived in England during the reign of King Solomon, that wise and wealthy King who commenced brilliantly but ended building temples for his many heathen wives and worshiping in them.

    I did read, according to legend, that it was a royal princess from the house of King Solomon who was brought by others to Ireland and British monarchs are on the Coronation Chair under which is that ‘Stone’.

    The Enclycopedia Britannica states this:

    ‘According to one Celtic legend, the stone was once the pillow upon which the patriarch Jacob rested at Bethel when he beheld the visions of angels.

    ‘From the Holy Land it purportedly traveled to Egypt, Sicily, and Spain and reached Ireland about 700 bce to be set upon the hill of Tara, where the ancient kings of Ireland were crowned. Thence it was taken by the Celtic Scots who invaded and occupied Scotland. About 840 ce it was taken by Kenneth MacAlpin to the village of Scone.’

    Then there is the legend regarding Joseph of Arimathea with his ideas of Zionism. He was the Pharisee and member of the Sanhedrin, very wealthy, who went to Pilate for the body of Jesus so that he could place it in his own sepulcher prepared for his death. He is believed to have visited Glastonbury, in Southern England and told of the gospel to the Celts there.

    Then there were the Tales of Chaucer, A.D.400. followed by Gildas in the sixth century who believed Britain was the New Israel and God’s Chosen people. He was followed by the Venerable Bede around A.D.700 who preached and wrote that England was Israel and it appears an old hymn arose from his idea - ‘And did those feet in ancient time, walk upon England’s holy green’.

    The Puritans and Reformers, following on from the Anglican and even its former base as Roman Catholicism, added greatly to the Zionism in the form of Jewry with its Hassidic forms and Chabad Judaism. Such people have now engulfed and provoked worship from up to one in three Americans, as one reads. This is at the point of the U.S.A. being in subjection and domination.

    A somewhat similar occurrence was in Russia but never was another nation so deceived, fooled and impregnated as were the British going back almost three thousand years, if one considers those of King Solomon’s time.

    Britain lost her empire because of it, but has now in London, an accumulation of the power through whom the empire basically did pass away. Its wealth remained and still is in the hands of those knew how to acquire and retain it - such a few, really.

    It is the Americans today, in whom the whole Zionist and Judaistic concepts have come to a certain fruition. No other nation has ever experienced this and hopefully none other ever will. It was from Britain that the Puritans sailed with their love of that Israel of old.

    It was Oliver Cromwell, the Puritan and believer in the Puritan idea that England would be reconstituted with Israel added to the gospel church. He brought the Jews back into England after their expulsion previously.

    Those early Puritans on arriving in their new country. The U.S.A. had Zionism from its very inception. Today it is full blown to the extent that both the British and American forms of it have been exported to all countries of the former British Empire, and to its subordinates, as well as to some European nations.

    The guilt for this lies at the door of the multitudes of ‘Christians’ who have not only preached ‘another gospel’ but have had such political influence and been under such financial and other obligations to their masters that it has brought the whole American nation into slavery and to the brink of a robotic revolution and perhaps nuclear war.

  • KathJuliane April 1, 2017 @ 1:56 pm

    US Has Killed More Than 20 Million People in 37 “Victim Nations” Since World War II — By James A. Lucas (Popular Resistance)

    First published in November 2015

    After the catastrophic attacks of September 11 2001 monumental sorrow and a feeling of desperate and understandable anger began to permeate the American psyche.

    A few people at that time attempted to promote a balanced perspective by pointing out that the United States had also been responsible for causing those same feelings in people in other nations, but they produced hardly a ripple.

    Although Americans understand in the abstract the wisdom of people around the world empathizing with the suffering of one another, such a reminder of wrongs committed by our nation got little hearing and was soon overshadowed by an accelerated “war on terrorism.”

    But we must continue our efforts to develop understanding and compassion in the world.

    Hopefully, this article will assist in doing that by addressing the question “How many September 11ths has the United States caused in other nations since WWII?”

    This theme is developed in this report which contains an estimated numbers of such deaths in 37 nations as well as brief explanations of why the U.S. is considered culpable.

    The causes of wars are complex. In some instances nations other than the U.S. may have been responsible for more deaths, but if the involvement of our nation appeared to have been a necessary cause of a war or conflict it was considered responsible for the deaths in it.

    In other words they probably would not have taken place if the U.S. had not used the heavy hand of its power. The military and economic power of the United States was crucial.

    This study reveals that U.S. military forces were directly responsible for about 10 to 15 million deaths during the Korean and Vietnam Wars and the two Iraq Wars. The Korean War also includes Chinese deaths while the Vietnam War also includes fatalities in Cambodia and Laos.

    The American public probably is not aware of these numbers and knows even less about the proxy wars for which the United States is also responsible.

    In the latter wars there were between nine and 14 million deaths in Afghanistan, Angola, Democratic Republic of the Congo, East Timor, Guatemala, Indonesia, Pakistan and Sudan.

    But the victims are not just from big nations or one part of the world. The remaining deaths were in smaller ones which constitute over half the total number of nations. Virtually all parts of the world have been the target of U.S. intervention.

    The overall conclusion reached is that the United States most likely has been responsible since WWII for the deaths of between 20 and 30 million people in wars and conflicts scattered over the world.

    To the families and friends of these victims it makes little difference whether the causes were U.S. military action, proxy military forces, the provision of U.S. military supplies or advisors, or other ways, such as economic pressures applied by our nation.

    They had to make decisions about other things such as finding lost loved ones, whether to become refugees, and how to survive.

    And the pain and anger is spread even further. Some authorities estimate that there are as many as 10 wounded for each person who dies in wars. Their visible, continued suffering is a continuing reminder to their fellow countrymen.

    It is essential that Americans learn more about this topic so that they can begin to understand the pain that others feel. Someone once observed that the Germans during WWII “chose not to know.”

    We cannot allow history to say this about our country. The question posed above was “How many September 11ths has the United States caused in other nations since WWII?” The answer is: possibly 10,000.

    An accurate count of the number of deaths is not easy to achieve, and this collection of data was undertaken with full realization of this fact.

    These estimates will probably be revised later either upward or downward by the reader and the author. But undoubtedly the total will remain in the millions.

    37 VICTIM NATIONS (as of 2015, and still counting)

  • KathJuliane April 1, 2017 @ 2:31 pm

    For the Serbs, as for the rest of the Orthodox world, it is now getting close to Paschaltide — the Easter Season, the upcoming season of joy of the Resurrection of our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ.

    For the Serbs, it coincides with the commemoration of the 1999 NATO bombing of Serbia for Bloody Western Easter, and deliberately timed that way by the Clinton Administration, I believe.

    As the sociopathic Jew, Mr. Thomas L. Friedman, the Foreign Affairs Editorialist of The New York Times, wrote on April 23, 1999 banging the the drums of war and waxing dementedly in the throes of his wargasm hatefully urging US-NATO on in the destruction of the Serbian people:

    “…Let’s at least have a real war…It should be lights out in Belgrade: every power grid, water pipe, bridge, road and war-related factory has to be targeted…the stakes have to be clear: Every week you [Serbs] ravage Kosovo is another decade we will set your country back by pulverizing you.

    You want 1950? We can do 1950. You want 1389? We can do 1389 too…Give war a chance….”

    All for what? The God-accursed lies, atrocity propaganda, and demonization by the propaganda machine composed of the the governments and political class of the US and the Atlantic Alliance, the think-tanks, the military-industrial complex, NGOs, the US-funded and supported Otpor! student/youth political organization in Serbia (then part of FR Yugoslavia) from 1998 until 2004, and the Jewmedia.

    Otpor! became the working and policy model for future “color revolutions” — up to and including Ukraine’s Euromaidan.

    So that the US could have a precedent model for lethal “humanitarian interventions” under R2P (Jewmerica’s “responsibility to protect”) bypassing the UNSC for war authorization, called the “Kosovo model”.

    Nenad Popović is a Serbian politician and businessman. At 3:00 in the video, Russian Report: NATO Destroys Serbia in 1999, he says:

    “The bombing of Serbia was an assassination attempt on international law of planetary proportions, and the Serbian precedent opened the way for the further NATO aggression in Iraq, Libya, and Syria.” [And Yemen, and Somalia, and so forth–Kj]

    Narrator: Are European citizens able to realize that many of their problems, above all, the migration crisis, originate in March 1999, when the US and its European allies started a war against a small country in the center of Europe without a UN mandate?

    He is former Vice-President of Democratic Party of Serbia, National Assembly of the Republic of Serbia, and President of the parliamentary group of friendship between Serbia and Russia.

    He founded the political party srpskanarodnapartija (Srpska Narodna Partija).He founded the political party Srpska Narodna Partija — Serb National Party — anti-NATO and euroskeptic.

    Mr. Popović is the owner and president of the international company ABS Electro which employs over three thousand people, engaged in the production of electro-technical equipment, creating advanced engineering solutions for a variety of industries such as electrical power, shipbuilding, oil, gas, metal, mining, and others.

    He graduated from the University of Belgrade Faculty of Machine Engineering. He finished his Master’s and doctoral studies at Moscow State University’s Faculty of Economy.

    Popović teaches at the Faculty of Economy of Moscow’s Lomonosov University and the Faculty of Economy of the Moscow State Mining University.

    He is president of the Foundation “Russian Necropolises” from Belgrade, which was responsible for the project of reconstruction of the complex of memorial monuments Russian necropolises in the New Cemetery in Belgrade.

    Popović is also member of the Board of the International Foundation for Unity of Orthodox Nations.

    As Vice-President of the National Assembly of the Republic of Serbia he was one of the main observes of the electoral process in the Crimean people’s referendum to peacefully accede to Russian Federation.

    Awards & Honors:

    Medal of Holy Sergey Radoniesky, for exceptional contribution to the development and straightening of relations among Christian Orthodox nations, awarded by Patriarch of Moscow and All Russia

    Medal of Holy Daniel of Moscow, for the spiritual renaissance of Russia, awarded by the Patriarch of Moscow and all Russia

    Medal of Humanity Award of the State Union Serbia and Montenegro for humanitarian work and exceptional contribution and help to the Serb population in Kosovo and Metohija

    Medal of Friendship, for special contribution to the development of economic and social relationships between Serbia and Russia, awarded by the President of the Russian Federation;

    Medal of the Saint Sava of the Second Grade, for the renewal and strengthening of faith and the Church in Serbia, awarded by His Holiness the Serbian Patriarch

    Future generations of the Serbian people will be able to remember the destruction and damage done by the “friendly and civilized” NATO Christians in the name of democracy and humanitarian intervention; and they will forever reject this kind of “democracy” and “humanity” for what it truly is, a monumentally and shamefully anti-Christian deed.

  • KathJuliane April 1, 2017 @ 3:17 pm

    Sorting Through the Lies of the Racak Massacre and other Myths of Kosovo

    by Stephen Gowans

    Remember why NATO spent 78-days bombing Yugoslavia in the spring of 1999?

    There was the ethnic cleansing. The atrocities. The refugees chased out of Kosovo by the Serb army. The mass graves. The heaps of bodies tossed into vats of sulphuric acid at the Trepca mines.

    NATO spokesman Jamie Shea said there were 100,000 Kosovars unaccounted for.


    If you’re like most people, you have at least a vague recollection of something that seemed to approach a modern-day Holocaust.

    Problem is, none of it happened.

    NATO’s original estimate of 100,000 ethnic Albanians slaughtered, later revised downward to 10,000, turns out to be considerably exaggerated.

    Dr. Peter Markesteyn, a Winnipeg forensic pathologist, was among the first war crimes investigators to arrive in Kosovo after NATO ended its bombing campaign. “We were told there were 100,000 bodies everywhere,” said Dr. Markesteyn. “We performed 1,800 autopsies — that’s it.”

    Fewer than 2,000 corpses. None found in the Trepca mines. No remains in the vats of sulphuric acid. Most found in isolated graves — not in the mass graves NATO warned about. And no clue as to whether the bodies were those of KLA fighters, civilians, even whether they were Serbs or ethnic Albanians.

    No wonder then that of all the incidents on which Slobodan Milosevic has been indicted for war crimes, the total body count is not 100,000, not 10,000, not even 1,800 — but 391!

    That’s 109 lives fewer than the 500 Yugoslav civilians Human Rights Watch estimates were killed by NATO bombs — and far fewer than what the death toll will eventually be once those who have yet to die from cancers induced by the terrible environmental devastation of the war are finally carried off as late — and unaccounted for — casualties.

    And it’s equal to the number of Palestinians who have been killed so far [2001] by the IDF — the Israeli army — in the latest Palestinian uprising [2000 Intifada].

    The difference is that the IDF, under the direction of Ehud Barak and now Ariel Sharon, is an occupying army, while the Yugoslav security forces, under Slobodan Milosevic, were conducting an counterinsurgency operation within their own borders. But Barak, mistakenly portrayed as a peace-nik, and Sharon, the architect of a long string of atrocities, including the infamous Sabra and Shatila massacres, aren’t under indictment for war crimes. Nor are they ever likely to be — not as long as the United States wields a veto at the UN.

    What’s more, there’s some question as to whether at least one of the war crimes Milosevic is accused of ever happened. And then there’s the revealing issue of when they happened.

    It seems that all of Milosevic’s war crimes, but one, happened after the bombing — highly curious, since the bombing was said to be necessary to stop a genocide, that, it seems now, NATO had no evidence of. (If they did, why haven’t they brought it forward?)

    Moreover, the one pre-bombing incident, the Racak massacre — which the United States cited as a major reason for the bombing campaign — is more likely to have been faked by the Kosovo Liberation Army (KLA), the guerilla army the Serbs were ensnared in a bloody civil war with, than to have represented the cold-blooded killing of ethnic Albanian non-combatants, as the KLA, and Washington’s man in Kosovo at the time, William Walker, alleged.

    It was Walker, at the time head of the Kosovo Verification Mission (KVM) who, on the morning of January 16, 1999, led the press to the Kosovar village of Racak, a KLA stronghold.

    There some 20 bodies were found in a shallow trench, and 20 more were found scattered throughout the village. The KLA, and Walker, alleged that masked Serb policemen had entered the village the previous day, and killed men, women and children at close range, after torturing and mutilating them.

    Chillingly, the Serb police were said to have whistled merrily as they went about their work of slaughtering the villagers.

    It was a horrible tableau, sure to whip up the indignation of the world — and it did.

    Clinton’s Secretary of State Madeleine Albright, as eager to scratch her ever itchy trigger finger as her boss was to scratch his illimitable sexual itches, demanded that Yugoslavia be bombed immediately. Albright, like a kid agonizingly counting down the hours to Christmas, would have to wait until after Milosevic’s rejection of NATO’s ultimata at Rambouillet to get her wish.

    Bill Clinton, not to be surpassed in expressing indignation, said, “We should remember what happened in the village of Racak…Innocent men, women, and children were taken from their homes to a gully, forced to kneel in the dirt, sprayed with gunfire — not because of anything they had done, but because of who they were.”

    But not everyone was so sure that Walker’s story was to be believed.

    The French newspaper La Monde had some trouble swallowing the story. It reported on Jan. 21, 1999, a few days after the incident, that an Associated Press TV crew had filmed a gun battle at Racak between Serb police and KLA guerillas.

    Indeed, the crew was present because the Serbs had tipped them off that they were going to enter the village to arrest a man accused of shooting a police officer. Also present were two teams of KVM monitors.It seems unlikely that if you’re about to carry out a massacre that you would invite the press — and international observers — to watch.

    The film showed that as soon as the Serbs entered Racak they came under heavy fire from KLA guerillas positioned in the surrounding hills. The idea that the police could dig a trench and then kill villagers at close range while under attack troubled La Monde.

    So too did the fact that, entering the village after the fire fight to assess the damage and interview the villagers, the KVM observers saw no sign of a massacre. What’s more, the villagers said nothing about a massacre either. Yet, when Walker returned the next day with the press — at the KLA’s invitation — there was the trench with the bodies.

    Could the police have returned later on and carried out the massacre under cover of darkness?

    That seems unlikely. Racak is a KLA stronghold. Serb police had already discovered that if they were going to enter the village they would have to deal with the guerillas. How could they torture, mutilate and cold-bloodedly kill villagers at close range while harassed by KLA gunfire?

    And why, wondered La Monde, were there few signs of spent cartridges and blood at the trench?

    And now there’s a report that the Finnish forensic pathologists who investigated the incident on behalf of the European Union, say there was no evidence of a massacre.

    In an article to be published in Forensic Science International at the end of February, the Finnish team writes that none of the bodies were mutilated, there was no evidence of torture, and only one was shot at close range. Thirty-seven of the corpses had gunpowder residue on their hands, suggesting that they had been using firearms, and only one of the corpses was a woman, and only one was under 15 years of age.

    Not the picture Clinton painted of innocent men, women and children, dragged from their homes, and sprayed with gunfire.

    The pathologists say Walker was quick to come to the conclusion that there was a massacre, even though the evidence was weak. And they point out that there is no evidence that the deceased were from Racak.

    The KLA, the Serbs charge, faked the massacre by laying out their fallen comrades in the trench they, themselves, prepared, and the United States used the staged massacre as a pretext for the bombing.

    The Washington Post said, “Racak transformed the West’s Balkan policy as singular events seldom do. The atrocity…convinced the administration and then its NATO allies that a six year effort to bottle up the ethnic conflict in Kosovo was doomed.”

    We’ll never know for sure what really happened at Racak, but the evidence linking Milosevic to a brutal massacre is pretty slim.

    “The first casualty of war is the truth,” says Paul Buteux, a political scientist at the University of Manitoba, echoing a clich that is sententiously uttered after every war, but never learned from. “It gets very murky. I have no doubt that whoever was putting those intelligence reports together prior to the NATO air campaign would be under pressure to put things in the worst possible light. There was a point when the spin doctors came in.”

    Putting things in the worst possible light? There’s a big difference between putting things in the worst possible light and turning 1,800 corpses into 100,000, between arguing that a genocide had to be stopped by a bombing campaign, and being able to adduce only one incident of a war crime — and a doubtful one at that — occurring before the bombing.

    That’s not putting things in the worst possible light. It’s doing what the leaders of NATO countries do repeatedly — lie.

    And yet, the press, uncritically conveying official lies, acts as if it trusts politicians not to lie about war. It behaves as if the latest war, unlike every other, is free of propaganda, distortion, manipulation and lies.

    Is it the media’s patriotic duty to turn off its bullshit detectors whenever a king’s ransom of high-tech military equipment is pressed into service to beat the tar out of yet another weakling country?

    There’s a belief that in times of war patriotism demands that we rally around our leaders. But as the American historian Howard Zinn points out, the most patriotic act in times of war is to ask questions, not to blindly follow leaders we know to be skilled and inveterate liars.

    Since the media can’t be depended on to ask questions, it’s up to the rest of us. And the first question patriots should ask themselves is why our leaders lied about Kosovo — and why they continue to lie about it today?

    Mr. Steve Gowans is a writer and political activist who lives in Ottawa, Canada.


    by courtesy & 2001 Steve Gowans

  • KathJuliane April 2, 2017 @ 2:58 pm

    Update on the Syrian Moderate Beheaders’ “humanitarian intervention” beseiging the Christian city of Mahardah, Hama governate.

    The jihadi “humanitarian intervention” blockade is being smashed, repulsed, and pushed back in a major coordinated counter-attack involving the SAA/RFAF coalition, (particularly Syria’s elite Tiger Forces and recently formed Russian-trained elite 5th Corps Ba’ath Brigade,) the members of the mostly Christian Mahardah battalion of the National Defense Forces, the people themselves, and no doubt, the hosts of Heaven.

    Oh, almost forgot about the deployment of the Military Police of Russia, the newest law enforcement branch multi-tool of war and peace for assisting locals restoring and maintaining defense, safety, stability and protection in recovered urban areas and distributing humanitarian aid, arriving in the city of Mahardah.

    And those pesky Russian special forces snipers.

    The north Hama terrorist offensive has failed.

    Al Masdar News: Field Report: Syrian Army attacks key jihadi stronghold in northern Hama

    DAMASCUS, SYRIA (3:35 P.M.) – Almost two weeks after the jihadi groups launched their massive attack on northern Hama countryside, the government forces have regained the lead after reversing all jihadi gains and recapturing almost all towns and points lost.

    Today, the Syrian Army began a wide-scale military operation to reclaim the town of Halfaya, located some 25 km to the north of Hama city. The operation was initiated by heavy missile and artillery shelling conducted by the Army units positioned in Batish and Majdal to the south.

    No major ground invasion has yet been made; however, the troops were capable of making a significant advance in the southern fields of the town.

    Located only 2 km to the east of Mahardah, the town retains a strategic importance since it serves as the launching pad for militants to attack the predominantly-Christian city.

    For years Mahardah has been targeted with mortars and homemade rockets fired from the rebel-held Halfaya, which – if recaptured – will form a major blow to the opposition forces and pave the way for the Army to expand northward and tighten the noose around the insurgent-controlled Tibat al-Imam.

    Pro-rebel accounts on social media mourned the death of scores of militants including Nawaf al-Saleh; a field commander of the FSA-affiliated Jaish al-Izza which currently fights under the banner of Hay’at Tahrir al-Sham (formerly Jabhet al-Nusra).

    South Front:


    This morning, government forces have launched a fresh atack against Hayat Tahir al-Sham (formerly Jabhat al-Nusra, the Syrian branch of al-Qaeda) and its allied militant groups in the northern countryside of the Syrian city of Hama.

    The goal of the operation is to retake an important militant-held town of Halfaya located east of Mahardeh and north of Khattab recently captured by the Syrian Arab Army (SAA) and other pro-government formations.

    The government attack started from heavy artillery strikes targeting militant positions inside and outside Halfaya and a firefight erupted in the area between Halfaya and Mahardeh.

    Pro-government sources believe that the SAA and its allies will attempt to enter Halfaya later today after the end of the fire preparation. However, if government forces decide to advance on Halfaya only from the eastern direction, the attack will likely result in no gains.

    Government forces have to develop a momentum at least from two directions (for example from the east and from the south) to have notable chances to regain this important town from Hayat Tahrir al-Sham and its allies.

    Al Masdar News: Russia dispatches forces to defend key Christian city in Syria

    DAMASCUS, SYRIA (11:50 P.M.) – Russia’s Military Police troops were reportedly deployed to the Christian city of Mahardah in northern Hama countryside amid increasing threats of a massive attack by jihadi groups in the region.

    Maharda, located 25 km to the north of Hama, has come under a swelling risk of being swept by jihadi rebels in nearby villages and towns following the recent battles in northern Hama.

    Reports came in that unknown numbers of the Russian Military Police have entered Mahardah, accompanied by snipers who were deployed to the eastern outskirts of the city.

    Jihadi groups, led by al-Qaeda-affiliate Hay’at Tagrir al-Sham, launched a powerful offensive nearly two weeks ago, seizing several towns and villages from the government forces.

    However, the Syrian Army, backed by heavy Russian and Syrian airstrikes, tipped the balance and recaptured most of the lost points.

    Government troops are now attempting to overrun rebels in Halfaya, a town just 2 km to the east of Mahardah which acts as the main threat to the Christian city.

  • John Klasny April 19, 2017 @ 5:02 pm

    Dear friends and patriots,

    What PayPal has done to Brother Nathanael should come as no surprise, for we can see the writing on the wall. There should be no doubt anymore about the time we are living in and what is coming next.

    Are we living in Biblical “End Times” and the coming Anti-Christ? If so, we can expect the noose to get tighter around Christians as the “Progressive Communists” do what they do best. Censorship, ridicule, isolation, division, rumors and lies, law suits, arrests, arson, prison camps, mass executions, and the Mark of the Beast. Only Jesus Christ can save us now.

    What can we do while we still have some freedom? We can resist to the best of our ability. Christians are not cowards, and “Turn the Other Cheek” does not mean to ignore evil, and simply allow this Satanic Cult to run right over us, because we are kind and gentle people.

    Nobody in their right mind wants to live in the U.S.A. without police protection; why would we suddenly decide to be defenseless against this vile attack?

    That said, not everyone is called upon to be a defender against violence. But there is something everyone can do with a little bit of computer experience, a little effort, and a small amount of money…and it needs to be done NOW!

    Soon, we can bet that Brother Nathanael’s videos will be removed from the internet entirely. We know that is coming next. The Zionists are silencing any opposition.

    I STRONGLY SUGGEST everyone begin downloading all of Brother Nathanael’s videos, articles and letters. Burn the videos to DVD. Build a library. Give DVD’s to friends and family. Get the word out!

    And be brave. If you fear the Jewish persecution if you are caught with this material in the future, remember that the Disciples and early Christians died for their faith with courage. Don’t give up without a fight.

    There are a number of downloader software available for free. It is highly probable that your activity of downloading and preserving +BN’s work will get the attention of some spying eyes. So what. Don’t dilly-dally once you start.

    Try to download and burn to DVD as much as you can in one sustained effort. It is possible (happened to me once) if you download material “They” don’t like, and you get it all set up to burn to DVD the next day…it will simply be gone…poof…not there the next day.

    I searched and searched every nook and crevice of my computer’s hard drive. Finally, I found a series of skull and cross bones with what should have been my project. Just saying, we are in a war, and “They” own the technology. The internet is the nervous system of the BEAST. Don’t forget that. Satan is using technology to build his empire.

    Brother Nathanael, it is with all due respect that I post this comment. I certainly am not suggesting we steal your work. We need to promote your work and preserve your critical information.

    The time is coming, soon, we can feel it, it’s happening, it is not our imagination. It’s time to batten down the hatches and rig the sails for storm conditions. There are ominous black clouds on the horizon, the wind is picking up, and the Jews are feeling giddy with confidence. Their Jewish ‘messiah’ (Antichrist) is coming! He’s coming all right…he might already be here.

    Finally, friends and patriots if you have read this far, please consider helping Brother Nathaniel with some money. He is on the front lines of this fight, providing us with excellent information.

    I’m sending a check by mail. I can’t afford much, but if we all pitch in what the price of two Hollywood Movie tickets would cost, it will add up. Don’t be the poor fool who Jesus warns us about. Our money will be worthless soon…so spend it wisely.

    (Tampa, FL 4/19/17)

Related news

Mass market fashion retailers philippines
Shiny rainwear fashion
Flechas de fogo 1950's fashion
Hanami japan 2019 fashion
American musician fashion designer
Young fashion blog uk sports